810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22749816)
1. Shear wave elasticity imaging based on acoustic radiation force and optical detection.
Cheng Y; Li R; Li S; Dunsby C; Eckersley RJ; Elson DS; Tang MX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-45. PubMed ID: 22749816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of acoustic radiation force and shear waves for absorption and stiffness sensing in ultrasound modulated optical tomography.
Li R; Elson DS; Dunsby C; Eckersley R; Tang MX
Opt Express; 2011 Apr; 19(8):7299-311. PubMed ID: 21503041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-source and multi-directional shear wave generation with intersecting steered ultrasound push beams.
Nabavizadeh A; Song P; Chen S; Greenleaf JF; Urban MW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):647-62. PubMed ID: 25881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo mapping of brain elasticity in small animals using shear wave imaging.
Macé E; Cohen I; Montaldo G; Miles R; Fink M; Tanter M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):550-8. PubMed ID: 20876009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reconstructing 3-D maps of the local viscoelastic properties using a finite-amplitude modulated radiation force.
Giannoula A; Cobbold R; Bezerianos A
Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):563-75. PubMed ID: 24011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the effects of reflected waves in transient shear wave elastography.
Deffieux T; Gennisson JL; Bercoff J; Tanter M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Oct; 58(10):2032-5. PubMed ID: 21989866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of the boundary conditions on longitudinal wave propagation in a viscoelastic medium.
Eskandari H; Baghani A; Salcudean SE; Rohling R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):3997-4017. PubMed ID: 19502703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transient displacement induced in shear wave elastography: comparison between analytical results and ultrasound measurements.
Elkateb Hachemi M; Callé S; Remenieras JP
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e221-5. PubMed ID: 16843510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bias observed in time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements using radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam.
Zhao H; Song P; Urban MW; Kinnick RR; Yin M; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1884-92. PubMed ID: 21924817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical tracking of superficial dynamics from an acoustic radiation force-induced excitation.
Bouchard RR; Van Soest G; Trahey GE; Van Der Steen AF
Ultrason Imaging; 2009 Jan; 31(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 19507680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Error in estimates of tissue material properties from shear wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry.
Urban MW; Chen S; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Apr; 56(4):748-58. PubMed ID: 19406703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear wave spectroscopy for in vivo quantification of human soft tissues visco-elasticity.
Deffieux T; Montaldo G; Tanter M; Fink M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Mar; 28(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 19244004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression.
Wojcinski S; Brandhorst K; Sadigh G; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2226-32. PubMed ID: 24035624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Narrowband shear wave generation by a Finite-Amplitude radiation force: The fundamental component.
Giannoula A; Cobbold RS
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):343-58. PubMed ID: 18334341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Creep-Recovery (ARFICR): A Noninvasive Method to Characterize Tissue Viscoelasticity.
Amador Carrascal C; Chen S; Urban MW; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Jan; 65(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 29283342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between shear wave dispersion magneto motive ultrasound and transient elastography for measuring tissue-mimicking phantom viscoelasticity.
Almeida TW; Sampaio DR; Bruno AC; Pavan TZ; Carneiro AA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2138-45. PubMed ID: 26670853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Scholte wave approach for ultrasonic surface acoustic wave elastography.
Liu J; Leer J; Aglayomov SR; Emelianov SY
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 36971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
