239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22750394)
1. Comparison of nucleic acid extraction platforms for detection of select biothreat agents for use in clinical resource limited settings.
Shipley MA; Koehler JW; Kulesh DA; Minogue TD
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):179-83. PubMed ID: 22750394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of RNA extraction kits for the purification and detection of an enteric virus surrogate on green onions via RT-PCR.
Xu R; Shieh YC; Stewart DS
J Virol Methods; 2017 Jan; 239():61-68. PubMed ID: 27836658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for detection of Francisella tularensis DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Dauphin LA; Walker RE; Petersen JM; Bowen MD
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Jul; 70(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 21546201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraction of viral nucleic acids: comparison of five automated nucleic acid extraction platforms.
Verheyen J; Kaiser R; Bozic M; Timmen-Wego M; Maier BK; Kessler HH
J Clin Virol; 2012 Jul; 54(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 22503856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring biothreat agents (Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis) with a portable real-time PCR instrument.
Mölsä M; Hemmilä H; Katz A; Niemimaa J; Forbes KM; Huitu O; Stuart P; Henttonen H; Nikkari S
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Aug; 115():89-93. PubMed ID: 26043838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-platform comparison of ten commercial master mixes for probe-based real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of bioterrorism threat agents for surge preparedness.
Buzard GS; Baker D; Wolcott MJ; Norwood DA; Dauphin LA
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):292-7. PubMed ID: 23107058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of the Schleicher and Schuell IsoCode Stix DNA isolation device and the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Mini Kit.
Coyne SR; Craw PD; Norwood DA; Ulrich MP
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 42(10):4859-62. PubMed ID: 15472363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques.
Turashvili G; Yang W; McKinney S; Kalloger S; Gale N; Ng Y; Chow K; Bell L; Lorette J; Carrier M; Luk M; Aparicio S; Huntsman D; Yip S
Exp Mol Pathol; 2012 Feb; 92(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 21963600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of commercial kits for the extraction and purification of viral nucleic acids from environmental and fecal samples.
Iker BC; Bright KR; Pepper IL; Gerba CP; Kitajima M
J Virol Methods; 2013 Jul; 191(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23578704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stabilization of biothreat diagnostic samples through vitrification matrices.
Minogue TD; Kalina WV; Coyne SR
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Jun; 101():81-5. PubMed ID: 24742968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of eight methods for the extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus spore DNA from eleven common interferents and a common swab.
Rose HL; Dewey CA; Ely MS; Willoughby SL; Parsons TM; Cox V; Spencer PM; Weller SA
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22668. PubMed ID: 21818364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-institute evaluations of inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct testing of aerosol and blood samples containing biological warfare agent DNA.
Minogue TD; Rachwal PA; Trombley Hall A; Koehler JW; Weller SA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2014 Feb; 80(4):1322-9. PubMed ID: 24334660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a panel of recombinase polymerase amplification assays for detection of biothreat agents.
Euler M; Wang Y; Heidenreich D; Patel P; Strohmeier O; Hakenberg S; Niedrig M; Hufert FT; Weidmann M
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 51(4):1110-7. PubMed ID: 23345286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of different pre-lysis methods and extraction kits for recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Lancefield group B Streptococcus) DNA from whole blood.
Burke RM; McKenna JP; Cox C; Coyle PV; Shields MD; Fairley DJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():103-108. PubMed ID: 27546716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of five commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Francisella tularensis DNA from spiked soil samples.
Whitehouse CA; Hottel HE
Mol Cell Probes; 2007 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 17011748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of commercial kits for extraction of DNA and RNA from Clostridium difficile.
Metcalf D; Weese JS
Anaerobe; 2012 Dec; 18(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 23128271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Viral Metagenomic Extraction Methods.
Klenner J; Kohl C; Dabrowski PW; Nitsche A
Curr Issues Mol Biol; 2017; 24():59-70. PubMed ID: 28686568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of eleven commercial DNA extraction kits for real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis spores in spiked dairy samples.
Mertens K; Freund L; Schmoock G; Hänsel C; Melzer F; Elschner MC
Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 170():29-37. PubMed ID: 24291177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of MagNA Pure 96, Chemagic MSM1, and QIAamp MinElute for hepatitis B virus nucleic acid extraction.
Kang SH; Lee EH; Park G; Jang SJ; Moon DS
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2012; 42(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 23090732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
