107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22750849)
1. An evaluation of calculation parameters in the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes and their effect on surface dose calculation.
Kim JH; Hill R; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):N267-78. PubMed ID: 22750849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
Chow JC; Jiang R
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of XiO Electron Monte Carlo-based calculations by measurements in a homogeneous phantom and by EGSnrc calculations in a heterogeneous phantom.
Edimo P; Kwato Njock MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2013 Nov; 29(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 23010450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system.
Mukumoto N; Tsujii K; Saito S; Yasunaga M; Takegawa H; Yamamoto T; Numasaki H; Teshima T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):571-9. PubMed ID: 19735883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental verification of EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated depth doses within a realistic parallel magnetic field in a polystyrene phantom.
Ghila A; Steciw S; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4804-4815. PubMed ID: 28626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo simulation of small electron fields collimated by the integrated photon MLC.
Mihaljevic J; Soukup M; Dohm O; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(3):829-43. PubMed ID: 21242628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo investigation of contaminant electrons due to a novel in vivo transmission detector.
Asuni G; Jensen JM; McCurdy BM
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):1207-23. PubMed ID: 21285480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy-loss straggling algorithms for Monte Carlo electron transport.
Chibani O
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2374-83. PubMed ID: 12408312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latent uncertainties of the precalculated track Monte Carlo method.
Renaud MA; Roberge D; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):479-90. PubMed ID: 25563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo dose calculation improvements for low energy electron beams using eMC.
Fix MK; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4577-88. PubMed ID: 20668339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A deterministic partial differential equation model for dose calculation in electron radiotherapy.
Duclous R; Dubroca B; Frank M
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3843-57. PubMed ID: 20571208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in homogeneous phantoms.
Wieslander E; Knöös T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1533-44. PubMed ID: 16510961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of absorbed doses from paediatric cone-beam CT scans: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Frush DP; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19889800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo commissioning of clinical electron beams using large field measurements.
O'Shea TP; Sawkey DL; Foley MJ; Faddegon BA
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4083-105. PubMed ID: 20601775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
