154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22751075)
1. Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream.
Sunohara MD; Topp E; Wilkes G; Gottschall N; Neumann N; Ruecker N; Jones TH; Edge TA; Marti R; Lapen DR
J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(4):1301-14. PubMed ID: 22751075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phosphorus and sediment loss in a catchment with winter forage grazing of cropland by dairy cattle.
McDowell RW
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(2):575-83. PubMed ID: 16510702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phosphorus, sediment, and Escherichia coli loads in unfenced streams of the Georgia Piedmont, USA.
Byers HL; Cabrera ML; Matthews MK; Franklin DH; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(6):2293-300. PubMed ID: 16275730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacteria, viruses, and parasites in an intermittent stream protected from and exposed to pasturing cattle: prevalence, densities, and quantitative microbial risk assessment.
Wilkes G; Brassard J; Edge TA; Gannon V; Jokinen CC; Jones TH; Neumann N; Pintar KD; Ruecker N; Schmidt PJ; Sunohara M; Topp E; Lapen DR
Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6244-57. PubMed ID: 24075721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of pasture management and off-stream water on temporal/spatial distribution of cattle and stream bank characteristics in cool-season grass pastures.
Schwarte KA; Russell JR; Morrical DG
J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3236-47. PubMed ID: 21531847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Associations among pathogenic bacteria, parasites, and environmental and land use factors in multiple mixed-use watersheds.
Wilkes G; Edge TA; Gannon VP; Jokinen C; Lyautey E; Neumann NF; Ruecker N; Scott A; Sunohara M; Topp E; Lapen DR
Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):5807-25. PubMed ID: 21889781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of streambank fencing on the environmental quality of cattle-excluded pastures.
Miller JJ; Chanasyk DS; Curtis T; Willms WD
J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(3):991-1000. PubMed ID: 20400594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
Meals DW; Hopkins RB
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bedding and within-pen location effects on feedlot pen runoff quality using a rainfall simulator.
Miller JJ; Olson EC; Chanasyk DS; Beasley BW; Yanke LJ; Larney FJ; McAllister TA; Olson BM; Selinger LB
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(2):505-15. PubMed ID: 16455851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Streamside management zones effectiveness for protecting water quality after forestland application of biosolids.
Pratt WA; Fox TR
J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):2106-20. PubMed ID: 19704153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of water troughs on cattle use of riparian zones in the Georgia Piedmont in the United States.
Franklin DH; Cabrera ML; Byers HL; Matthews MK; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2151-9. PubMed ID: 19286818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Farmyard point discharges and their influence on nutrient and labile carbon dynamics in a second order stream draining through a dairy unit.
Edwards AC; Hooda PS
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):591-9. PubMed ID: 18082927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loading of fecal indicator bacteria in North Carolina tidal creek headwaters: hydrographic patterns and terrestrial runoff relationships.
Stumpf CH; Piehler MF; Thompson S; Noble RT
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4704-15. PubMed ID: 20673947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nutrient loss and water quality under extensive grazing in the upper Burdekin river catchment, North Queensland.
O'Reagain PJ; Brodie J; Fraser G; Bushell JJ; Holloway CH; Faithful JW; Haynes D
Mar Pollut Bull; 2005; 51(1-4):37-50. PubMed ID: 15757706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the Yield and Load of Contaminants with Stream Order: Would Policy Requiring Livestock to Be Fenced Out of High-Order Streams Decrease Catchment Contaminant Loads?
McDowell RW; Cox N; Snelder TH
J Environ Qual; 2017 Sep; 46(5):1038-1047. PubMed ID: 28991968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Water quality response to riparian restoration in an agricultural watershed in Vermont, USA.
Meals DW
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):175-82. PubMed ID: 11379130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pasture BMP effectiveness using an HRU-based subarea approach in SWAT.
Sheshukov AY; Douglas-Mankin KR; Sinnathamby S; Daggupati P
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():276-84. PubMed ID: 26517276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pollution from animal husbandry in China: a case study of the Han River Basin.
Sun C; Wu H
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):872-8. PubMed ID: 22766880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cattle-derived microbial input to source water catchments: An experimental assessment of stream crossing modification.
Smolders A; Rolls RJ; Ryder D; Watkinson A; Mackenzie M
J Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 156():143-9. PubMed ID: 25841195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents.
Hall TJ; Ragsdale RL; Arthurs WJ; Ikoma J; Borton DL; Cook DL
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 19063588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]