BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22752523)

  • 1. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
    Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of intravascular signal in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI using adaptive complex independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Chopra R; Martel AL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):699-710. PubMed ID: 23247848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
    Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI.
    de Rochefort L; Nguyen T; Brown R; Spincemaille P; Choi G; Weinsaft J; Prince MR; Wang Y
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5328-39. PubMed ID: 19175092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane.
    Simonis FF; Sbrizzi A; Beld E; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1236-45. PubMed ID: 26525012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
    Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (I): Theory, method, and phantom experiments.
    van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1190-1196. PubMed ID: 29193415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
    Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
    Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
    J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI.
    Cheng HL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17410576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.