These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22752628)

  • 1. [Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)].
    Klamann MK; Maier AK; Gonnermann J; Torun N; Ruokonen PC
    Ophthalmologe; 2012 Nov; 109(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 22752628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.
    Achiron A; Blumenfeld O; Avizemer H; Karmona L; Leybowich G; Man V; Bartov E; Burgansky-Eliash Z
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):822-828. PubMed ID: 27871779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Mawatari Y; Kobayashi A; Yokogawa H; Sugiyama K
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 55(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 21400052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
    Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of corneal thickness in keratoconic corneas on IOP measurement with IOPen, iCare, dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry].
    Klamann MK; Maier AK; Gonnermann J; Ruokonen P; Bertelmann E; Torun N
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Jul; 230(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 23670524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular Pressure Measurements After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Maier AK; Gundlach E; Pahlitzsch M; Gonnermann J; Corkhill C; Bertelmann E; Joussen AM; Klamann MK; Torun N
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):258-265. PubMed ID: 27906816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in edematous corneas before and after Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Chang DT; Pantcheva MB; Noecker RJ
    Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 20548237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Yildiz I; Altan C; Çakmak S; Genc S; Yildirim Y; Agca A
    J Glaucoma; 2022 Nov; 31(11):909-914. PubMed ID: 35939831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus.
    Özcura F; Yıldırım N; Tambova E; Şahin A
    J Optom; 2017; 10(2):117-122. PubMed ID: 27402573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Vajaranant TS; Price MO; Price FW; Wilensky JT; Edward DP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 May; 145(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 18329627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Masoudi A; Azari AA; Veisi A
    Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29877927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification.
    Rahimi M; Panahi Bazaz M; Sharifipour F; Hajizadeh M; Cheraghian B
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3183-3190. PubMed ID: 35552955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty].
    Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results.
    Yildiz A; Yasar T
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2018 Aug; 15(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 30047543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.