These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influence of corneal thickness in keratoconic corneas on IOP measurement with IOPen, iCare, dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry]. Klamann MK; Maier AK; Gonnermann J; Ruokonen P; Bertelmann E; Torun N Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Jul; 230(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 23670524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clemmensen K; Hjortdal J Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 92(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 23607620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Masoudi A; Azari AA; Veisi A Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29877927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification. Rahimi M; Panahi Bazaz M; Sharifipour F; Hajizadeh M; Cheraghian B Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):3183-3190. PubMed ID: 35552955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty]. Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude]. Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results. Yildiz A; Yasar T Med Glas (Zenica); 2018 Aug; 15(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 30047543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]