These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22752849)

  • 1. Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution.
    Kim JH; Christianson K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2013 Oct; 42(5):393-411. PubMed ID: 22752849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working Memory Capacity and Relative Clause Attachment Preference of Persian EFL Learners: Does Segmentation Play Any Role?
    Mahmoodi MH; Sheykholmoluki H; Zoghipaydar MR; Shahsavari S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):683-706. PubMed ID: 35013920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.
    Yadav H; Vaidya A; Shukla V; Husain S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 44(4):e12822. PubMed ID: 32223024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
    Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of sentence length and complexity on working memory performance in Hungarian children with specific language impairment (SLI): A cross-linguistic comparison.
    Marton K; Schwartz RG; Farkas L; Katsnelson V
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(6):653-73. PubMed ID: 17079221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.
    Payne BR; Grison S; Gao X; Christianson K; Morrow DG; Stine-Morrow EA
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24291806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Memory-Load Interference Tasks Tell Us about Spoken Relative Clause Processing.
    Cheng T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Jun; 52(3):691-720. PubMed ID: 36648589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach.
    Swets B; Desmet T; Hambrick DZ; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Feb; 136(1):64-81. PubMed ID: 17324085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the online reading effects of emotionality on relative clause attachment.
    García-Orza J; Gavilán JM; Fraga I; Ferré P
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):543-553. PubMed ID: 28447242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.
    Mansbridge M; Park S; Tamaoka K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Aug; 46(4):827-845. PubMed ID: 27943081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is There a Particular RC Attachment Preference in Turkish? Negotiating the Effects of Semantic Factors.
    Başer Z; Hohenberger A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2020 Aug; 49(4):511-539. PubMed ID: 32189183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Memory-Load Interference in Processing Spoken Chinese Relative Clauses.
    Cheng T; Wu JT; Huang S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1035-1055. PubMed ID: 29550893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
    Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks.
    Cheng T; Wu JT
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31545324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: An Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English.
    Niu R; Liu H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):1043-1062. PubMed ID: 35484411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing.
    Rohde H; Levy R; Kehler A
    Cognition; 2011 Mar; 118(3):339-58. PubMed ID: 21216396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: a hierarchical linear modeling analysis.
    Traxler MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1107-21. PubMed ID: 17910193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Role of Animacy in Children's Interpretation of Relative Clauses in English: Evidence From Sentence-Picture Matching and Eye Movements.
    Macdonald R; Brandt S; Theakston A; Lieven E; Serratrice L
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e12874. PubMed ID: 32713028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of concurrent arithmetical and syntactic complexity on self-paced reaction times and eye fixations.
    Evans WS; Caplan D; Waters G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1203-11. PubMed ID: 21956381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.