These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22754103)

  • 1. Effects of differential reinforcement and rules with feedback on preference for choice and verbal reports.
    Karsina A; Thompson RH; Rodriguez NM; Vanselow NR
    Anal Verbal Behav; 2012; 28(1):31-57. PubMed ID: 22754103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a history of differential reinforcement on preference for choice.
    Karsina A; Thompson RH; Rodriguez NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Mar; 95(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 21541125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reinforcement uncertainty enhances preference for choice in humans.
    Rost KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Sep; 110(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29961968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reinforcement context on choice.
    Jacob TC; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 May; 49(3):367-81. PubMed ID: 3385353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of experience on preference between forced and free choice.
    Ono K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Jan; 81(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 15113131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.
    Grace RC; Bedell MA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 12083678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choice between reliable and unreliable outcomes: mixed percentage-reinforcement in concurrent chains.
    Spetch ML; Dunn R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jan; 47(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 3559459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.
    Moore J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):345-65. PubMed ID: 20514166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.
    Jimenez-Gomez C; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 22287805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the relative values of alternatives on preference for free-choice in humans.
    Rost KA; Hemmes NS; Alvero AM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Sep; 102(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 25110898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of differential and lag reinforcement schedules on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism.
    Lee R; McComas JJ; Jawor J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 12555910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.
    Dunn R; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 2324663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.
    Hanratty LA; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):1062-1074. PubMed ID: 33990131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Verbal self-reports of delayed matching to sample by humans.
    Critchfield TS; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):321-44. PubMed ID: 16812611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice for aperiodic versus periodic ratio schedules: A comparison of concurrent and concurrent-chain procedures.
    Rider DP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 16812346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditioned reinforcement dynamics in three-link chained schedules.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 9037785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES
    Learn Behav; 2003 Aug; 31(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 14577547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verbal self-reports about matching to sample: effects of the number of elements in a compound sample stimulus.
    Critchfield TS; Perone M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):193-214. PubMed ID: 8433064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Nov; 62(3):353-66. PubMed ID: 16812746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.