These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22754273)
1. Not quite normal: Consequences of violating the assumption of normality in regression mixture models. Lee Van Horn M; Smith J; Fagan AA; Jaki T; Feaster DJ; Masyn K; Hawkins JD; Howe G Struct Equ Modeling; 2012; 19(2):227-249. PubMed ID: 22754273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite Mixtures for Simultaneously Modelling Differential Effects and Non-Normal Distributions. George MR; Yang N; Jaki T; Feaster DJ; Lamont AE; Wilson DK; Horn ML Multivariate Behav Res; 2013 Nov; 48(6):816-844. PubMed ID: 25717214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using regression mixture models with non-normal data: Examining an ordered polytomous approach. George MR; Yang N; Van Horn ML; Smith J; Jaki T; Feaster D; Masyn K; Howe G J Stat Comput Simul; 2013 Jan; 83(4):757-770. PubMed ID: 23687397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite Mixture Models with Student t Distributions: an Applied Example. Burgess-Hull AJ Prev Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(6):872-883. PubMed ID: 32306224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Knief U; Forstmeier W Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2576-2590. PubMed ID: 33963496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of an equality constraint on the class-specific residual variances in regression mixtures: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Kim M; Lamont AE; Jaki T; Feaster D; Howe G; Van Horn ML Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):813-26. PubMed ID: 26139512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear regression and the normality assumption. Schmidt AF; Finan C J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():146-151. PubMed ID: 29258908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementing continuous non-normal skewed distributions in latent growth mixture modeling: An assessment of specification errors and class enumeration. Depaoli S; Winter SD; Lai K; Guerra-Peña K Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):795-821. PubMed ID: 31012738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regression Mixture Models: Does Modeling the Covariance Between Independent Variables and Latent Classes Improve the Results? Lamont AE; Vermunt JK; Van Horn ML Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 26881956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class Enumeration and Parameter Recovery of Growth Mixture Modeling and Second-Order Growth Mixture Modeling in the Presence of Measurement Noninvariance between Latent Classes. Kim ES; Wang Y Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1499. PubMed ID: 28928691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The misuse of distributional assumptions in functional class scoring gene-set and pathway analysis. Ho CH; Huang YJ; Lai YJ; Mukherjee R; Hsiao CK G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs. Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model. Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Non-Normality on Extraction of Spurious Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Models. Sen S; Cohen AS; Kim SH Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):98-113. PubMed ID: 29881041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis. McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the bootstrap for model validation in mixture models. Jaki T; Su TL; Kim M; Lee Van Horn M Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2018; 47(4):1028-1038. PubMed ID: 30533972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of robust regression in translational neuroscience studies with non-Gaussian outcome data. Malek-Ahmadi M; Ginsberg SD; Alldred MJ; Counts SE; Ikonomovic MD; Abrahamson EE; Perez SE; Mufson EJ Front Aging Neurosci; 2023; 15():1299451. PubMed ID: 38328735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Checking distributional assumptions for pharmacokinetic summary statistics based on simulations with compartmental models. Shen M; Russek-Cohen E; Slud EV J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):756-772. PubMed ID: 27669105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]