These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22754404)

  • 1. Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements.
    Beauchamp KA; Lin YS; Das R; Pande VS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1409-1414. PubMed ID: 22754404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Cino EA; Choy WY; Karttunen M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Aug; 8(8):2725-2740. PubMed ID: 22904695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical Assessment of Current Force Fields. Short Peptide Test Case.
    Vymětal J; Vondrášek J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jan; 9(1):441-51. PubMed ID: 26589046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.
    Lindorff-Larsen K; Piana S; Palmo K; Maragakis P; Klepeis JL; Dror RO; Shaw DE
    Proteins; 2010 Jun; 78(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 20408171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intrinsic conformational features of amino acids from a protein coil library and their applications in force field development.
    Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Mar; 15(10):3413-28. PubMed ID: 23385383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microsecond simulations of mdm2 and its complex with p53 yield insight into force field accuracy and conformational dynamics.
    Pantelopulos GA; Mukherjee S; Voelz VA
    Proteins; 2015 Sep; 83(9):1665-76. PubMed ID: 26138282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a predictive understanding of slow methyl group dynamics in proteins.
    Long D; Li DW; Walter KF; Griesinger C; Brüschweiler R
    Biophys J; 2011 Aug; 101(4):910-5. PubMed ID: 21843482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conformational dynamics of HIV-1 protease: a comparative molecular dynamics simulation study with multiple amber force fields.
    Meher BR; Kumar MV; Sharma S; Bandyopadhyay P
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2012 Dec; 10(6):1250018. PubMed ID: 22845837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic properties of force fields.
    Vitalini F; Mey AS; Noé F; Keller BG
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Feb; 142(8):084101. PubMed ID: 25725706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Updated Test of AMBER Force Fields and Implicit Solvent Models in Predicting the Secondary Structure of Helical, β-Hairpin, and Intrinsically Disordered Peptides.
    Maffucci I; Contini A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Feb; 12(2):714-27. PubMed ID: 26784558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB.
    Maier JA; Martinez C; Kasavajhala K; Wickstrom L; Hauser KE; Simmerling C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Aug; 11(8):3696-713. PubMed ID: 26574453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurately do force fields represent protein side chain ensembles?
    Petrović D; Wang X; Strodel B
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):935-944. PubMed ID: 29790608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Force Field Benchmark of Amino Acids. 2. Partition Coefficients between Water and Organic Solvents.
    Zhang H; Jiang Y; Cui Z; Yin C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1669-1681. PubMed ID: 30047730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrepancies between conformational distributions of a polyalanine peptide in solution obtained from molecular dynamics force fields and amide I' band profiles.
    Verbaro D; Ghosh I; Nau WM; Schweitzer-Stenner R
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Dec; 114(51):17201-8. PubMed ID: 21138254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Force Field Accuracy Using Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Data of Hyper-thermostable Glutamate Dehydrogenase.
    Oroguchi T; Oide M; Wakabayashi T; Nakasako M
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 Oct; 124(39):8479-8494. PubMed ID: 32841031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
    Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
    Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate calculation of mutational effects on the thermodynamics of inhibitor binding to p38α MAP kinase: a combined computational and experimental study.
    Zhu S; Travis SM; Elcock AH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jul; 9(7):3151-3164. PubMed ID: 23914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.