These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22755729)

  • 41. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE; Lobbes MB; Lalji UC; Gelissen N; Bouwman RW; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CR
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Phase-contrast digital tomosynthesis.
    Hammonds JC; Price RR; Donnelly EF; Pickens DR
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2353-8. PubMed ID: 21776769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
    Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Compton-scattering measurement of diagnostic x-ray spectrum using high-resolution Schottky CdTe detector.
    Maeda K; Matsumoto M; Taniguchi A
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1542-7. PubMed ID: 16013712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Technical Note: spektr 3.0-A computational tool for x-ray spectrum modeling and analysis.
    Punnoose J; Xu J; Sisniega A; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4711. PubMed ID: 27487888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of pinhole collimator materials based on sensitivity equivalence.
    Bom V; Goorden M; Beekman F
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(11):3199-214. PubMed ID: 21540488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Half-value-layer increase owing to tungsten buildup in the x-ray tube: fact or fiction.
    Stears JG; Felmlee JP; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):837-8. PubMed ID: 3737925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measured scattered x-ray energy spectra for simulated irradiation geometries in diagnostic radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Warren H
    Med Phys; 1996 Jul; 23(7):1271-6. PubMed ID: 8839423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of a slit camera for MTF measurements.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Waidelich JM
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2286-94. PubMed ID: 10587209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Setting of the soft X-ray field for the calibration of the dosimeters used in mammographic field].
    Sekimoto M; Katoh T; Satoh M; Yano K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 22805444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.
    Kharrati H; Zarrad B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.