BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22757637)

  • 1. A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
    Krishna A; Rickard MJ; Keshava A; Dent OF; Chapuis PH
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22757637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
    Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
    Perdawood SK; Lund T
    Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
    Han JG; Wang ZJ; Qian Q; Dai Y; Zhang ZQ; Yang JS; Li F; Li XB
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25379997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.
    Asplund D; Haglind E; Angenete E
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22221401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
    Bülow S; Christensen IJ; Iversen LH; Harling H;
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Nov; 13(11):1256-64. PubMed ID: 20958912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
    Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal carcinoma].
    Chi P; Chen Z
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 17(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24953356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.
    Zhou X; Sun T; Xie H; Zhang Y; Zeng H; Fu W
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 25704132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.
    Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X
    Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
    Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].
    Chen Y; Chi P
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).
    Park EJ; Baik SH; Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK; Sohn SK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1672-82. PubMed ID: 26183956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
    Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
    Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal low rectal cancer excision outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Nardi P; Summo V; Vignali A; Capretti G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2997-3006. PubMed ID: 25605518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
    Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perineal and pelvic anatomy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dissection.
    Açar Hİ; Kuzu MA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Sep; 54(9):1179-83. PubMed ID: 21825900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.