273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22757637)
1. A comparison of published rates of resection margin involvement and intra-operative perforation between standard and 'cylindrical' abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.
Krishna A; Rickard MJ; Keshava A; Dent OF; Chapuis PH
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22757637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Seshadri RA; West NP; Sundersingh S
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 19(7):O253-O262. PubMed ID: 28503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Han JG; Wang ZJ; Qian Q; Dai Y; Zhang ZQ; Yang JS; Li F; Li XB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Dec; 57(12):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25379997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.
Asplund D; Haglind E; Angenete E
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1191-6. PubMed ID: 22221401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
Bülow S; Christensen IJ; Iversen LH; Harling H;
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Nov; 13(11):1256-64. PubMed ID: 20958912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal carcinoma].
Chi P; Chen Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Jun; 17(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 24953356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-Assisted Abdominoperineal Resection: Clinical, Pathologic, and Oncologic Outcomes.
Eftaiha SM; Pai A; Sulo S; Park JJ; Prasad LM; Marecik SJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 27270512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.
Zhou X; Sun T; Xie H; Zhang Y; Zeng H; Fu W
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):474-81. PubMed ID: 25704132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection versus laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: A retrospective comparative study from China.
Qi X; Liu M; Tan F; Xu K; Yao Z; Zhang N; Yang H; Zhang C; Xing J; Cui M; Su X
Int J Surg; 2019 Nov; 71():158-165. PubMed ID: 31526895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.
Huang A; Zhao H; Ling T; Quan Y; Zheng M; Feng B
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Mar; 29(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 24385025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Chi P
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 20(3):326-332. PubMed ID: 28338169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos).
Park EJ; Baik SH; Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK; Sohn SK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1672-82. PubMed ID: 26183956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.
Bianco F; Romano G; Tsarkov P; Stanojevic G; Shroyer K; Giuratrabocchetta S; Bergamaschi R;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 27369739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision.
Tilney HS; Tekkis PP; Sains PS; Constantinides VA; Heriot AG;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jan; 50(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17115338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal low rectal cancer excision outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
De Nardi P; Summo V; Vignali A; Capretti G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2997-3006. PubMed ID: 25605518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes after abdominoperineal resection compared with restorative resection for low rectal cancer: patient- and tumor-related or technical factors only?
Reshef A; Lavery I; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jan; 55(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22156867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perineal and pelvic anatomy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dissection.
Açar Hİ; Kuzu MA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Sep; 54(9):1179-83. PubMed ID: 21825900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
