145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2275876)
1. Efficacy of combined image and flow cytometric DNA assessments in human breast cancer: a methodological study based on a routine histopathological material of 2024 excised tumour specimens.
Falkmer UG; Hagmar T; Auer G
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Sep; 2(5):297-312. PubMed ID: 2275876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological aspects on cytochemical DNA assessment of adenocarcinoma of the endometrium by means of image and flow cytometry using conventionally formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens.
Askensten U; Moberger B; Auer G
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1990; 60(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 1695087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caveats in the estimation of DNA-ploidy in paraffin embedded specimens of primary prostate cancer and lymph node metastases by flow and image cytometry.
Berner A; Danielsen HE; Juul NO; Juul ME; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Nesland JM; Fosså SD
Anal Cell Pathol; 1993 Nov; 5(6):339-52. PubMed ID: 8305330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures.
Spyratos F; Briffod M
Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 9195572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [DNA cytometry using paraffin embedded tumor tissues. Comparison of flow cytometry (FCM) and image cytometry (ICM)].
Baretton G; Blasenbreu S; Li X; DePascale T; Löhrs U
Zentralbl Pathol; 1994 Feb; 139(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7512820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA ploidy in soft tissue sarcoma: comparison of flow and image cytometry with clinical follow-up in 93 patients.
Dreinhöfer KE; Baldetorp B; Akerman M; Fernö M; Rydholm A; Gustafson P
Cytometry; 2002 Feb; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11857594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytochemical assessments of the nuclear DNA distribution pattern by means of image and flow cytometry in thyroid neoplasms and in non-neoplastic thyroid lesions. A comparative methodological study.
Wallin G; Askensten U; Bäckdahl M; Grimelius L; Lundell G; Auer G
Acta Chir Scand; 1989; 155(4-5):251-8. PubMed ID: 2800873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA image cytometry on sections as compared with image cytometry on smears and flow cytometry in melanoma.
Klapperstück T; Wohlrab W
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 8875057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation guidelines of DNA histograms from tissue sections of breast cancer.
Aaltonen M; Kuopio T; Laine J; Alanen K; Juhola M; Collan Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(1B):547-51. PubMed ID: 10769723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA quantification of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by flow cytometry and cytophotometric image analysis using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue.
Dorman AM; Walsh TN; Droogan O; Curran B; Hourihane DO; Hennessy TP; Leader M
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):886-92. PubMed ID: 1459005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between flow cytometry and image cytometry in ploidy distribution assessments in gynecologic cancer.
Kaern J; Wetteland J; Tropé CG; Farrants GW; Juhng SW; Pettersen EO; Reith A; Danielsen HE
Cytometry; 1992; 13(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 1576895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A DNA cytometric proliferation index improves the value of the DNA ploidy pattern as a prognosticating tool in patients with carcinoma of the prostate.
Ahlgren G; Lindholm K; Falkmer U; Abrahamsson PA
Urology; 1997 Sep; 50(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 9301701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determination, by in situ hybridization on interphasic nucleus, a cytogenetic DNA index; application to breast cancer; comparison of this DNA index to DNA indexes determined by imaging and flow cytometry].
Vago P; Lecart S; Simony J; Lequeux N; Radal M; Bureau JP
Morphologie; 2000 Mar; 84(264):41-8. PubMed ID: 10923339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 7734408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA image cytometry on sections compared with flow cytometry in human bone metastases.
Wohlrab D; Klapperstück T; Holzhausen HJ; Held A; Hein W
Oncol Rep; 2005 Oct; 14(4):1005-12. PubMed ID: 16142365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility in DNA flow cytometric analysis of breast cancer: comparison of 12 laboratories' results for 67 sample homogenates.
Baldetorp B; Bendahl PO; Fernö M; Alanen K; Delle U; Falkmer U; Hansson-Aggesjö B; Höckenström T; Lindgren A; Mossberg L
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 7587742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of DNA content as measured by flow cytometry and image analysis in 1864 specimens.
Bertino B; Knape WA; Pytlinska M; Strauss K; Hammou JC
Anal Cell Pathol; 1994 May; 6(4):377-94. PubMed ID: 8060892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intratumoral variations in DNA distribution patterns in mammary adenocarcinomas.
Askensten UG; von Rosen AK; Nilsson RS; Auer GU
Cytometry; 1989 May; 10(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 2714115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional confocal laser scanning DNA ploidy cytometry in thick histological sections.
Tekola P; Baak JP; van Ginkel HA; Belien JA; van Diest PJ; Broeckaert MA; Schuurmans LT
J Pathol; 1996 Oct; 180(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 8976883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.
Ottesen GL
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (108):1-67. PubMed ID: 12874968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
