These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22759889)

  • 21. Obviousness-type double patenting.
    Becker DM
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2005 Oct; 4(10):805. PubMed ID: 16237843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.
    Du L; Kamenova K; Caulfield T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 16():55. PubMed ID: 26302779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. All animals are equal, but some are better than others: patenting transgenic animals.
    Mark DA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():245-68. PubMed ID: 11645691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Public-private partnerships in biomedical research: resolving conflicts arising under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986.
    Bulleit TN
    J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11652568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. International conflicts over patenting human DNA sequences in the United States and the European Union: an argument for compulsory licensing and a fair-use exemption.
    Gitter DM
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1623-91. PubMed ID: 12741387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conflict crimps IT policy. HHS' rules called hindrance to technology.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Aug; 34(34):9. PubMed ID: 15449873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The two meanings of how and the gene patenting debate.
    Evans JH
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 12230851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judicial protection of managed care consumers: an empirical study of insurance coverage disputes.
    Hall MA; Smith TR; Naughton M; Ebbers A
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1996; 26():1055-68. PubMed ID: 11656847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human cloning: the role of law.
    Martyn SR
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):375-86. PubMed ID: 12627586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why the gene patenting controversy persists.
    Eisenberg RS
    Acad Med; 2002 Dec; 77(12 Pt 2):1381-7. PubMed ID: 12480648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The case for patenting medical procedures.
    Garris JJ
    Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):85-108. PubMed ID: 8819597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patenting medical procedures: a search for a compromise between ethics and economics.
    Gocyk-Farber B
    Cardozo Law Rev; 1997; 18():1527-67. PubMed ID: 12173633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Molecular farming, patents and access to medicines.
    Drake PM; Thangaraj H
    Expert Rev Vaccines; 2010 Aug; 9(8):811-9. PubMed ID: 20673006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Encouraging further innovation: Ariad v. Eli Lilly and the written description requirement.
    Jakas J
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2012; 42(3):1287-36. PubMed ID: 22803220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Corruption: Good governance powers innovation.
    Mungiu-Pippidi A
    Nature; 2015 Feb; 518(7539):295-7. PubMed ID: 25693546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The gene patenting controversy: a convergence of law, economic interests, and ethics.
    Kevles DJ; Berkowitz A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 12645549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patentability in the United States.
    Fashena SJ; Jackson DA
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 May; 3(5):381. PubMed ID: 15152629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genome funds "wasted" on patents.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1991 Sep; 131(1785):22. PubMed ID: 11659381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
    Doerflinger RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biotechnology. Lawsuit challenges legal basis for patenting human genes.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5930):1000-1. PubMed ID: 19460975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.