BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22761274)

  • 1. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk.
    Heine JJ; Scott CG; Sellers TA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Schueler BA; Couch FJ; Olson JE; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Jul; 104(13):1028-37. PubMed ID: 22761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
    Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An automated approach for estimation of breast density.
    Heine JJ; Carston MJ; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Wu FF; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Vachon CM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3090-7. PubMed ID: 18990749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
    Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
    Tamimi RM; Byrne C; Colditz GA; Hankinson SE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1178-87. PubMed ID: 17652278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated measurement of volumetric mammographic density: a tool for widespread breast cancer risk assessment.
    Brand JS; Czene K; Shepherd JA; Leifland K; Heddson B; Sundbom A; Eriksson M; Li J; Humphreys K; Hall P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Sep; 23(9):1764-72. PubMed ID: 25012995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography.
    Fowler EE; Sellers TA; Lu B; Heine JJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):113502. PubMed ID: 24320473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibrated Breast Density Measurements.
    Fowler EE; Smallwood A; Khan N; Miltich C; Drukteinis J; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 30545682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
    Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
    Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data.
    Vachon CM; Fowler EE; Tiffenberg G; Scott CG; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Heine JJ
    Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 15(1):R1. PubMed ID: 23289950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.
    Manduca A; Carston MJ; Heine JJ; Scott CG; Pankratz VS; Brandt KR; Sellers TA; Vachon CM; Cerhan JR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):837-45. PubMed ID: 19258482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.