These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22761667)

  • 1. Dynamics of opinion forming in structurally balanced social networks.
    Altafini C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38135. PubMed ID: 22761667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Targeted Bipartite Consensus of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Credibility Intervals.
    Zou Y; Meng Z
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Jan; 52(1):372-383. PubMed ID: 32149671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computing global structural balance in large-scale signed social networks.
    Facchetti G; Iacono G; Altafini C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Dec; 108(52):20953-8. PubMed ID: 22167802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamical models explaining social balance and evolution of cooperation.
    Traag VA; Van Dooren P; De Leenheer P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60063. PubMed ID: 23634204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the low-energy landscape of large-scale signed social networks.
    Facchetti G; Iacono G; Altafini C
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Sep; 86(3 Pt 2):036116. PubMed ID: 23030989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymptotic theory of time-varying social networks with heterogeneous activity and tie allocation.
    Ubaldi E; Perra N; Karsai M; Vezzani A; Burioni R; Vespignani A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35724. PubMed ID: 27774998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamics of deceptive interactions in social networks.
    Barrio RA; Govezensky T; Dunbar R; Iñiguez G; Kaski K
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Nov; 12(112):. PubMed ID: 26510829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergence, evolution and scaling of online social networks.
    Wang LZ; Huang ZG; Rong ZH; Wang XF; Lai YC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111013. PubMed ID: 25380140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opinion evolution in different social acquaintance networks.
    Chen X; Zhang X; Wu Z; Wang H; Wang G; Li W
    Chaos; 2017 Nov; 27(11):113111. PubMed ID: 29195305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A complex network approach to political analysis: Application to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.
    Brito ACM; Silva FN; Amancio DR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229928. PubMed ID: 32191720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-stage complex contagions.
    Melnik S; Ward JA; Gleeson JP; Porter MA
    Chaos; 2013 Mar; 23(1):013124. PubMed ID: 23556961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A partial knowledge of friends of friends speeds social search.
    Elsisy A; Szymanski BK; Plum JA; Qi M; Pentland A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255982. PubMed ID: 34412110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opinion formation in time-varying social networks: The case of the naming game.
    Maity SK; Manoj TV; Mukherjee A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Sep; 86(3 Pt 2):036110. PubMed ID: 23030983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opinion and community formation in coevolving networks.
    Iñiguez G; Kertész J; Kaski KK; Barrio RA
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Dec; 80(6 Pt 2):066119. PubMed ID: 20365243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical social triad statistics can be explained with dyadic homophylic interactions.
    Pham TM; Korbel J; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Feb; 119(6):. PubMed ID: 35105814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Community detectability and structural balance dynamics in signed networks.
    Morrison M; Gabbay M
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jul; 102(1-1):012304. PubMed ID: 32795056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network analyses reveal structure in insect social groups.
    Alwash N; Levine JD
    Curr Opin Insect Sci; 2019 Oct; 35():54-59. PubMed ID: 31394418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How women organize social networks different from men.
    Szell M; Thurner S
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1214. PubMed ID: 23393616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bounded Confidence under Preferential Flip: A Coupled Dynamics of Structural Balance and Opinions.
    Parravano A; Andina-Díaz A; Meléndez-Jiménez MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164323. PubMed ID: 27716815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence.
    Quattrociocchi W; Caldarelli G; Scala A
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():4938. PubMed ID: 24861995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.