These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22761672)

  • 21. Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.
    Haumann NT; Parkkonen L; Kliuchko M; Vuust P; Brattico E
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():7489108. PubMed ID: 27524998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
    Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
    J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
    Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A spatiotemporal framework for MEG/EEG evoked response amplitude and latency variability estimation.
    Limpiti T; Van Veen BD; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):616-25. PubMed ID: 19789097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MEG-EEG Information Fusion and Electromagnetic Source Imaging: From Theory to Clinical Application in Epilepsy.
    Chowdhury RA; Zerouali Y; Hedrich T; Heers M; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):785-812. PubMed ID: 26016950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Graph-based variability estimation in single-trial event-related neural responses.
    Gramfort A; Keriven R; Clerc M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1051-61. PubMed ID: 20142163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revealing time-unlocked brain activity from MEG measurements by common waveform estimation.
    Takeda Y; Yamanaka K; Yamagishi N; Sato MA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e98014. PubMed ID: 24879410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simultaneous MEG and EEG source analysis.
    Huizenga HM; van Zuijen TL; Heslenfeld DJ; Molenaar PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jul; 46(7):1737-51. PubMed ID: 11474922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatiotemporal noise covariance estimation from limited empirical magnetoencephalographic data.
    Jun SC; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5549-64. PubMed ID: 17047269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigation of EEG and MEG source imaging accuracy in reconstructing extended cortical sources.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7013-6. PubMed ID: 22255953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EEG/MEG source reconstruction with spatial-temporal two-way regularized regression.
    Tian TS; Huang JZ; Shen H; Li Z
    Neuroinformatics; 2013 Oct; 11(4):477-93. PubMed ID: 23842791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data.
    Jas M; Engemann DA; Bekhti Y; Raimondo F; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():417-429. PubMed ID: 28645840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Iterative Reweighted Mixed-Norm Estimate for Spatio-Temporal MEG/EEG Source Reconstruction.
    Strohmeier D; Bekhti Y; Haueisen J; Gramfort A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2218-2228. PubMed ID: 27093548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory-evoked responses.
    Taulu S; Hari R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1524-34. PubMed ID: 18661502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.