151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22762154)
1. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level.
de Azevedo Vaz SL; Neves FS; Figueirêdo EP; Haiter-Neto F; Campos PS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 22762154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface-an in vitro radiographic study.
Vidor MM; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HLD; da Silveira PF; Araujo CW; da Silveira HED
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jul; 46(5):20160296. PubMed ID: 28211288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size.
Haiter-Neto F; Casanova MS; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 19101494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of VistaScan image enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated periapical lesions on intraoral radiographs.
Brasil DM; Yamasaki MC; Santaella GM; Guido MCZ; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180146. PubMed ID: 30260235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of phosphor plate-based radiographic image specifications on fractal analysis of alveolar bone.
Oliveira-Santos N; Michels M; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 31324583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancement cone beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection.
de-Azevedo-Vaz SL; Alencar PN; Rovaris K; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Nov; 116(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 24018127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Progression of experimental chronic peri-implantitis in dogs: clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Martins MC; Shibli JA; Abi-Rached RS; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2005 Aug; 76(8):1367-73. PubMed ID: 16101371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard.
Corpas Ldos S; Jacobs R; Quirynen M; Huang Y; Naert I; Duyck J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 21143531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
