These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22762512)

  • 1. Ultrasound weight estimation of large fetuses.
    Lindell G; Källén K; Maršál K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Oct; 91(10):1218-25. PubMed ID: 22762512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
    Lindell G; Marsál K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia.
    Hoopmann M; Abele H; Wagner N; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(4):204-13. PubMed ID: 20523027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E; Dall'Asta A; Kiener AJO; Carpano MG; Suprani A; Ghi T; Frusca T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation in Sweden.
    Lindström L; Cnattingius S; Axelsson O; Granfors M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jun; 102(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 36964980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal weight estimation by automated three-dimensional limb volume model in late third trimester compared to two-dimensional model: a cross-sectional prospective observational study.
    Wu X; Niu Z; Xu Z; Jiang Y; Zhang Y; Meng H; Ouyang Y
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):365. PubMed ID: 33964891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of birthweight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness improves the detection of macrosomic fetuses.
    Scioscia M; Stepniewska A; Trivella G; De Mitri P; Bettocchi S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1325-8. PubMed ID: 25231406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography for Estimation of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity in the Setting of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia.
    Gibson KS; Stetzer B; Catalano PM; Myers SA
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1123-9. PubMed ID: 27091915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
    Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
    Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies.
    Wong SF; Chan FY; Cincotta RB; Oats JJ; McIntyre HD
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Nov; 41(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 11787919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birth-weight prediction by two- and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.
    Bennini JR; Marussi EF; Barini R; Faro C; Peralta CF
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 20069666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester.
    Scioscia M; Scioscia F; Vimercati A; Caradonna F; Nardelli C; Pinto LR; Selvaggi LE
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
    Pagani G; Palai N; Zatti S; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of conventional 2D ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in twin pregnancy.
    Kadji C; Bevilacqua E; Hurtado I; Carlin A; Cannie MM; Jani JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):128.e1-128.e11. PubMed ID: 29045850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
    Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.