145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22762536)
1. Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.
Johansson K; Greis G; Johansson B; Grundtmann A; Pahlby Y; Törn S; Axelberg H; Carlsson P
Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 22762536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparative study of the degree of patient satisfaction in intermittent catheterization with Lofric and polyvinyl chloride catheters].
López Pereira P; Martínez Urrutia MJ; Lobato L; Rivas S; Jaureguizar Monereo E
Actas Urol Esp; 2001; 25(10):725-30. PubMed ID: 11803779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization.
Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization.
Pachler J; Frimodt-Møller C
BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):767-9. PubMed ID: 10368193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials.
Witjes JA; Del Popolo G; Marberger M; Jonsson O; Kaps HP; Chapple CR
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2794-8. PubMed ID: 19837425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Patient satisfaction with two different types of bladder catheters].
Litherland AT; Aas MS; Schiøtz HA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16415935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization.
Taskinen S; Fagerholm R; Ruutu M
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Oct; 4(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 18790422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD006008. PubMed ID: 25208303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel product for intermittent catheterisation: its impact on compliance with daily life--international multicentre study.
Bjerklund Johansen T; Hultling C; Madersbacher H; Del Popolo G; Amarenco G;
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 17166653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-perceived discomfort with two coated urinary catheters.
Litherland AT; Schiøtz HA
Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 17505374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Diokno AC; Mitchell BA; Nash AJ; Kimbrough JA
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 7815580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and patient satisfaction with urethral clean intermittent catheterization in spina bifida patients: comparing coated vs uncoated catheters.
Burki T; Abasher A; Alshahrani A; Al Hams AW; Ibrahim H; Albadawe H; Al Modhen F; Jamalalail Y; Al Shammari A
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 31699601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, randomized, crossover, multicenter study comparing quality of life using compact versus standard catheters for intermittent self-catheterization.
Chartier-Kastler E; Amarenco G; Lindbo L; Soljanik I; Andersen HL; Bagi P; Gjødsbøl K; Domurath B
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):942-7. PubMed ID: 23587630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of pain and catheter-related bladder discomfort relative to balloon volumes of indwelling urinary catheters: A prospective study.
Zugail AS; Pinar U; Irani J
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 30637359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter.
Sutherland RS; Kogan BA; Baskin LS; Mevorach RA
J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2041-3. PubMed ID: 8911385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-centre study of intraurethral valve-pump catheter in women with a hypocontractile or acontractile bladder.
Chen TY; Ponsot Y; Carmel M; Bouffard N; Kennelly MJ; Tu LM
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 15964124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder.
DeFoor W; Reddy P; Reed M; VanderBrink B; Jackson E; Zhang B; Denlinger J; Noh P; Minevich E; Sheldon C
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):373.e1-373.e5. PubMed ID: 28713004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
