These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22763527)

  • 21. Face up to fraud.
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7381):237-8. PubMed ID: 22258568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
    Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misconduct: Lessons from researcher rehab.
    DuBois JM; Chibnall JT; Tait R; Vander Wal J
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7606):173-5. PubMed ID: 27279195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research integrity: Sabotage!
    Maher B
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Iran's scientists condemn instances of plagiarism.
    Ardalan F; Arfaei H; Mansouri R; Balalimood M; Farhud D; Malekzadeh R; Firouzabadi H; Izadpanah-Jahromi K; Safavi A; Kaveh A; Saidi F; Shafiee A; Sobouti Y
    Nature; 2009 Dec; 462(7275):847. PubMed ID: 20016576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sense of injustice can lead scientists to act unethically, study finds.
    Guterman L
    Chron High Educ; 2006 Apr; 52(33):A21. PubMed ID: 16789294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
    Marín-Spiotta E
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mystery fraud accusations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7319):1020. PubMed ID: 20981065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bad press.
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7422):7-8. PubMed ID: 23136647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'Rehab' helps errant researchers return to the lab.
    Cressey D
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7431):147. PubMed ID: 23302839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Japan ponders steps to probe data errors.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6914):348. PubMed ID: 12459746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting.
    Fanelli D
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):149. PubMed ID: 23407504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Whistle-blower breaks his silence.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7485):593-4. PubMed ID: 24476864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Glory days or the lure of scientific misconduct.
    Knoll E
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11653392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time is right to confront misconduct.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):7. PubMed ID: 22859166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A silent scientist under fire.
    Guterman L
    Chron High Educ; 2006 Feb; 52(22):A15, A18-9. PubMed ID: 16789291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.