These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22765914)

  • 1. An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.
    Bueno M; Fabrigoule C; Deleurence P; Ndiaye D; Fort A
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():69-79. PubMed ID: 22765914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System in simple and in dual task from an electrophysiological perspective.
    Bueno M; Fort A; Francois M; Ndiaye D; Deleurence P; Fabrigoule C
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Apr; 541():219-23. PubMed ID: 23485786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of totally and partially predictive alert in distracted and undistracted subjects: An event related potential study.
    Fort A; Collette B; Bueno M; Deleurence P; Bonnard A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():578-86. PubMed ID: 22742776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.
    Reinmueller K; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():217-229. PubMed ID: 31063907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving.
    Bliss JP; Acton SA
    Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):499-509. PubMed ID: 14559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
    Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.
    Chen H; Cao L; Logan DB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 21972864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving.
    Wester AE; Böcker KB; Volkerts ER; Verster JC; Kenemans JL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18215526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulator training with a forward collision warning system: effects on driver-system interactions and driver trust.
    Koustanaï A; Cavallo V; Delhomme P; Mas A
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):709-21. PubMed ID: 23156617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm.
    Hibberd DL; Jamson SL; Carsten OM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1096-103. PubMed ID: 22999382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems.
    Lees MN; Lee JD
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1264-86. PubMed ID: 17558669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.