These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22765914)

  • 21. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.
    Lubbe N
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():23-32. PubMed ID: 28454868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
    Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study.
    Sonnleitner A; Treder MS; Simon M; Willmann S; Ewald A; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():110-8. PubMed ID: 24144496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of driver identity on driving safety in a retrospective feedback system.
    Zhao G; Wu C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():354-65. PubMed ID: 22269519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings--a naturalistic driving study.
    Wege C; Will S; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():259-70. PubMed ID: 23068426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Wallis G; Cloete S; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():104-11. PubMed ID: 23207839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments.
    Kiefer RJ; LeBlanc DJ; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 15667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of distractions on young adult drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Reimer B; Mehler B; D'Ambrosio LA; Fried R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):842-51. PubMed ID: 20380911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of road surface appearance and low friction warning systems on driver behaviour and confidence in the warning system.
    Kircher K; Thorslund B
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18937091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Population distributions of time to collision at brake application during car following from naturalistic driving data.
    Kusano KD; Chen R; Montgomery J; Gabler HC
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():95-104. PubMed ID: 26403908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Driving errors that predict simulated rear-end collisions in drivers with multiple sclerosis.
    Krasniuk S; Classen S; Morrow SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 33688770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task.
    Leung S; Starmer G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1056-65. PubMed ID: 16036208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):1107-14. PubMed ID: 18074709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An improved automated braking system for rear-end collisions: A study based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K; Yang J; Xue Q
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():416-427. PubMed ID: 35249623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.