These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22766492)
1. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Khambay BS; Bowman A; Smith J; Paul Siebert J; Oehler S; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 May; 64(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 20947459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging]. Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a passive stereophotogrammetry system for imaging of the breast: a geometric analysis. Catherwood T; McCaughan E; Greer E; Spence RA; McIntosh SA; Winder RJ Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 21382736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Validation of Subjective Estimates of Female Breast Volume and Comparison with Objective Methods]. Henseler H; Hille-Betz U; Vogt PM Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Dec; 47(6):371-7. PubMed ID: 26460496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study. Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement. Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system. Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Kinect Recording System for objective three- and four-dimensional breast assessment with image overlays. Henseler H; Bonkat SK; Vogt PM; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):e27-34. PubMed ID: 26565080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems. Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 20951517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months. Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]