These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22766610)

  • 1. Defining the impact of maternal cell contamination on the interpretation of prenatal microarray analysis.
    Lamb AN; Rosenfeld JA; Coppinger J; Dodge ET; Dabell MP; Torchia BS; Ravnan JB; Shaffer LG; Ballif BC
    Genet Med; 2012 Nov; 14(11):914-21. PubMed ID: 22766610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Using Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on DNA from Amniotic Fluid and Chorionic Villus Sampling.
    Patel A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1885():171-186. PubMed ID: 30506198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
    Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide copy number analysis on DNA from fetal cells isolated from the blood of pregnant women.
    Kølvraa S; Singh R; Normand EA; Qdaisat S; van den Veyver IB; Jackson L; Hatt L; Schelde P; Uldbjerg N; Vestergaard EM; Zhao L; Chen R; Shaw CA; Breman AM; Beaudet AL
    Prenat Diagn; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1127-1134. PubMed ID: 27761919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory aspects of prenatal microarray analysis.
    Lamb AN
    Clin Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 31(4):615-30, ix. PubMed ID: 22118740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-based prenatal diagnosis for chromosome abnormalities using cell-free fetal DNA in amniotic fluid.
    Miura S; Miura K; Masuzaki H; Miyake N; Yoshiura KI; Sosonkina N; Harada N; Shimokawa O; Nakayama D; Yoshimura S; Matsumoto N; Niikawa N; Ishimaru T
    J Hum Genet; 2006; 51(5):412-417. PubMed ID: 16622586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH.
    Bi W; Breman AM; Venable SF; Eng PA; Sahoo T; Lu XY; Patel A; Beaudet AL; Cheung SW; White LD
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Oct; 28(10):943-9. PubMed ID: 18792925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization technologies across microarray platforms.
    Hester SD; Reid L; Nowak N; Jones WD; Parker JS; Knudtson K; Ward W; Tiesman J; Denslow ND
    J Biomol Tech; 2009 Apr; 20(2):135-51. PubMed ID: 19503625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Current limitations and difficulties in application of microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis].
    Chen Y; Choy KW
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21287509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA.
    Yatsenko SA; Shaw CA; Ou Z; Pursley AN; Patel A; Bi W; Cheung SW; Lupski JR; Chinault AC; Beaudet AL
    J Mol Diagn; 2009 May; 11(3):226-37. PubMed ID: 19324990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and clinical value of maternal incidental findings during noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies.
    Brison N; Van Den Bogaert K; Dehaspe L; van den Oever JM; Janssens K; Blaumeiser B; Peeters H; Van Esch H; Van Buggenhout G; Vogels A; de Ravel T; Legius E; Devriendt K; Vermeesch JR
    Genet Med; 2017 Mar; 19(3):306-313. PubMed ID: 27584908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience.
    Rooryck C; Toutain J; Cailley D; Bouron J; Horovitz J; Lacombe D; Arveiler B; Saura R
    Eur J Med Genet; 2013 Jul; 56(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 23454632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microarray Techniques to Analyze Copy-Number Alterations in Genomic DNA: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array.
    Szuhai K; Vermeer M
    J Invest Dermatol; 2015 Oct; 135(10):e37. PubMed ID: 26358390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of the clinical utility of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and an exploration of a framework for reporting unclassified variants and risk factors.
    Brady PD; Delle Chiaie B; Christenhusz G; Dierickx K; Van Den Bogaert K; Menten B; Janssens S; Defoort P; Roets E; Sleurs E; Keymolen K; De Catte L; Deprest J; de Ravel T; Van Esch H; Fryns JP; Devriendt K; Vermeesch JR
    Genet Med; 2014 Jun; 16(6):469-76. PubMed ID: 24177055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CGcgh: a tool for molecular karyotyping using DNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH).
    Lee YS; Chao A; Chao AS; Chang SD; Chen CH; Wu WM; Wang TH; Wang HS
    J Biomed Sci; 2008 Nov; 15(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 18712492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SNP array analysis in constitutional and cancer genome diagnostics--copy number variants, genotyping and quality control.
    de Leeuw N; Hehir-Kwa JY; Simons A; Geurts van Kessel A; Smeets DF; Faas BH; Pfundt R
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(3-4):212-21. PubMed ID: 21934286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Array CGH analysis in high-risk pregnancies: comparing DNA from cultured cells and cell-free fetal DNA.
    Gruchy N; Decamp M; Richard N; Jeanne-Pasquier C; Benoist G; Mittre H; Leporrier N
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 22025315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic method for detecting copy number variation in a fetal genome using maternal plasma sequencing.
    Rampášek L; Arbabi A; Brudno M
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):i212-8. PubMed ID: 24931986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive assessment of array-based platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variants.
    Pinto D; Darvishi K; Shi X; Rajan D; Rigler D; Fitzgerald T; Lionel AC; Thiruvahindrapuram B; Macdonald JR; Mills R; Prasad A; Noonan K; Gribble S; Prigmore E; Donahoe PK; Smith RS; Park JH; Hurles ME; Carter NP; Lee C; Scherer SW; Feuk L
    Nat Biotechnol; 2011 May; 29(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 21552272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of copy number variation detection for a SNP array platform.
    Zhang X; Du R; Li S; Zhang F; Jin L; Wang H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 15():50. PubMed ID: 24555668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.