197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22766996)
1. Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring.
Azzam RS; Sallum RA; Brandão JF; Navarro-Rodriguez T; Nasi A
Arq Gastroenterol; 2012; 49(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22766996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interference with daily activities and major adverse events during esophageal pH monitoring with bravo wireless capsule versus conventional intranasal catheter: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Iluyomade A; Olowoyeye A; Fadahunsi O; Thomas L; Libend CN; Ragunathan K; Fenster J; Vignesh S
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 26952638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wireless esophageal pH capsule for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter clinical study.
Yang XJ; Gan T; Wang L; Liao Z; Tao XH; Shen W; Zhao XY
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(40):14865-74. PubMed ID: 25356046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and Efficacy of Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients Suspected of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review.
Kessels SJM; Newton SS; Morona JK; Merlin TL
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 51(9):777-788. PubMed ID: 28877081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gastroesophageal reflux monitoring: pH (catheter and capsule) and impedance.
Hong SK; Vaezi MF
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2009 Jan; 19(1):1-22, v. PubMed ID: 19232277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS.
Azzam RS; Azzam GB; Nasi A
Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2021; 34(1):e1566. PubMed ID: 34008710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
Li JN; Liu CL; Tao XH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 13():10. PubMed ID: 23317032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To Bravo or not? A comparison of wireless esophageal pH monitoring and conventional pH catheter to evaluate non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in a multiracial Asian cohort.
Ang D; Teo EK; Ang TL; Ong J; Poh CH; Tan J; Fock KM
J Dig Dis; 2010 Feb; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 20132427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indications of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, capsule pH monitoring, combined pH monitoring with multichannel impedance, esophageal manometry, radiology and scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux disease?
Vardar R; Keskin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 28(Suppl 1):S16-S21. PubMed ID: 29199161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Fuchs HF; Müller DT; Berlth F; Maus MK; Fuchs C; Dübbers M; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Leers JM
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 29534167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term wireless pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: prolonging the test beyond 48 hours is unnecessary and may be misleading.
Capovilla G; Salvador R; Spadotto L; Voltarel G; Pesenti E; Perazzolo A; Nicoletti L; Merigliano S; Costantini M
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1-8. PubMed ID: 28859392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing.
Hirano I; Richter JE;
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Mar; 102(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 17335450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
