These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22766996)

  • 21. Clinical utility of the wireless pH capsule.
    Lacy BE; Dukowicz AC; Robertson DJ; Weiss JE; Teixeira P; Kelley ML
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 21030875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
    Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.
    Han MS; Lada MJ; Nieman DR; Tschoner A; Peyre CG; Jones CE; Watson TJ; Peters JH
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):1700-8. PubMed ID: 25398192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.
    Håkanson BS; Berggren P; Granqvist S; Ljungqvist O; Thorell A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Current applications of evolving methodologies in gastroesophageal reflux disease testing.
    Weber C; Davis CS; Fisichella PM
    Dig Liver Dis; 2011 May; 43(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 21324762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparative prospective study of two positioning modes of 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring: by esophageal manometry and by the pH step-up technique].
    Nasi A; Frare Rde C; Brandão JF; Falcão AM; Muchelsohn NH; Sifrim D
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2008; 45(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 19148352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [24-hour esophageal impedance-ph monitoring: technical aspects, indications and results].
    Karoui S; Ben Temime H; Serghini M; Zouiten L; Boubaker J; Filali A
    Tunis Med; 2012 May; 90(5):351-6. PubMed ID: 22585640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.
    Tsou YK; Lien JM; Chen CK; Lin CH; Chen HY; Lee MS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 19(11):1805-10. PubMed ID: 23555169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.
    Marchese M; Spada C; Iacopini F; Familiari P; Shah SG; Tringali A; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2006 Aug; 38(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 17001571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring in children.
    Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2008 Jun; 18(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 18503382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.
    Ahlawat SK; Novak DJ; Williams DC; Maher KA; Barton F; Benjamin SB
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Jan; 40(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16340628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Esophageal pH monitoring goes wireless.
    Lawrence BL; Taylor D
    Nursing; 2007 Oct; 37(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 17906527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. COMBINED 24-HOURS ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING AND MULTICHANNEL INTRALUMINAL IMPEDANCE FOR COMPARISON OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CHILDREN WITH TYPICAL VERSUS ATYPICAL SYMPTOMS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE.
    Dehghani SM; Taghavi SA; Javaherizadeh H; Nasri M
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2016; 53(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 27438415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Dhiman RK; Saraswat VA; Mishra A; Naik SR
    Dig Dis Sci; 1996 Apr; 41(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 8674398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptom recurrence in patients discontinuing proton pump inhibitors for Bravo
    Schey R; Alla SP; Midani D; Parkman HP
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2017; 82(4):277-286. PubMed ID: 28385467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
    Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.
    Ravi A; Gunasekaran T; Berman J
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Jan; 62(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 26196198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal thresholds and discriminatory power of 48-h wireless esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosisof GERD.
    Wenner J; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 102(9):1862-9. PubMed ID: 17509034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Emerenziani S; Sifrim D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 21(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 15930987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy and tolerability of the Bravo catheter-free pH capsule in patients between the ages of 4 and 18 years.
    Croffie JM; Fitzgerald JF; Molleston JP; Gupta SK; Corkins MR; Pfefferkorn MD; Lim JR; Steiner SJ; Dadzie SK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2007 Nov; 45(5):559-63. PubMed ID: 18030233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.