421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22767091)
1. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracies of DNA-based estimates of genetic merit derived from Angus or multibreed beef cattle training populations.
Weber KL; Drake DJ; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ; Kuehn LA; Thallman RM; Schnabel RD; Snelling WM; Pollak EJ; Van Eenennaam AL
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4191-202. PubMed ID: 22871929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.
Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle - an independent validation study.
Akanno EC; Plastow G; Woodward BW; Bauck S; Okut H; Wu XL; Sun C; Aalhus JL; Moore SS; Miller SP; Wang Z; Basarab JA
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2896-904. PubMed ID: 24802042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of molecular breeding values based on within- and across-breed training in beef cattle.
Kachman SD; Spangler ML; Bennett GL; Hanford KJ; Kuehn LA; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Saatchi M; Garrick DJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Pollak EJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Aug; 45(1):30. PubMed ID: 23953034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Vinsky M; Li C
Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 25393962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Across-breed adjustment factors for expected progeny differences for carcass traits.
Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2007 Jun; 85(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 17339411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Associations of marker panel scores with feed intake and efficiency traits in beef cattle using preselected single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Grant JR; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3362-71. PubMed ID: 21642494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.
Saatchi M; McClure MC; McKay SD; Rolf MM; Kim J; Decker JE; Taxis TM; Chapple RH; Ramey HR; Northcutt SL; Bauck S; Woodward B; Dekkers JC; Fernando RL; Schnabel RD; Garrick DJ; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Nov; 43(1):40. PubMed ID: 22122853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
