376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22767161)
1. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
Randleman JB
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The downside of open-access publishing.
Haug C
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
Pearson H
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability in a time of uncertainty.
Shelton JS; Beach J
J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 Jul; 65(7):896-7. PubMed ID: 15291675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
Davis TR
J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Open-access publishing: where is the value?
Crawford BD
Lancet; 2003 Nov; 362(9395):1578-80. PubMed ID: 14615117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Learning to review.
Freedman R
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
Moore JP
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure also leads to worthless publications.
de Carvalho LB
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ["Predatory publishers"].
Olsson H
Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. CES4Health.info: an online tool for peer reviewed publication and dissemination of diverse products of community-engaged scholarship.
Jordan C; Seifer SD; Gelmon SB; Ryan K; McGinley P
Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2011; 5(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 21623022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
