These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22768897)
1. Analysis of an electrochemical blood glucose monitoring system with hematocrit compensation: improved accuracy by design. Lyon ME; Lyon AW J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):656-8. PubMed ID: 22768897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hematocrit compensation in electrochemical blood glucose monitoring systems. Teodorczyk M; Cardosi M; Setford S J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 22768896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic electrochemistry: a step in the right direction. Rice MJ J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1176-8. PubMed ID: 22027313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comprehensive evaluation of strip performance in multiple blood glucose monitoring systems. Katz LB; Macleod K; Grady M; Cameron H; Pfützner A; Setford S Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 May; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25702769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices. Musholt PB; Schipper C; Thomé N; Ramljak S; Schmidt M; Forst T; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 22027312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the performance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system: why ease of use studies need to be part of accuracy studies. Krouwer JS J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1610-1. PubMed ID: 22226285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive evaluation of the performance of the test strip technology for OneTouch Verio glucose meter systems. Bailey T; Chang A; Rosenblit PD; Jones L; Teft G; Setford S; Mahoney J Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Aug; 14(8):701-9. PubMed ID: 22853721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blood glucose meters employing dynamic electrochemistry are stable against hematocrit interference in a laboratory setting. Pfützner A; Musholt PB; Schipper C; Demircik F; Hengesbach C; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1530-7. PubMed ID: 24351179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of total analytical error in consumer and hospital glucose meters contributed by hematocrit, maltose, and ascorbate. Lyon ME; DuBois JA; Fick GH; Lyon AW J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 4(6):1479-94. PubMed ID: 21129345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Meter With Novel Hematocrit Correction Technology, With Three Currently Used Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. Dunseath GJ; Bright D; Luzio SD J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):568-574. PubMed ID: 30623673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a new interference-resistant glucose meter. Vanavanan S; Santanirand P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Chittamma A; Dubois JA; Shirey T; Heinz M Clin Biochem; 2010 Jan; 43(1-2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19769953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis article on the performance analysis of the OneTouch UltraVue blood glucose monitoring system. Solnica B J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Sep; 3(5):1166-7. PubMed ID: 20144432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a new meter designed for assisted monitoring of blood glucose and point-of-care testing. Macrury S; Srinivasan A; Mahoney JJ J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 7(2):389-98. PubMed ID: 23566997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interference studies with two hospital-grade and two home-grade glucose meters. Lyon ME; Baskin LB; Braakman S; Presti S; Dubois J; Shirey T Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Oct; 11(10):641-7. PubMed ID: 19821756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Point-of-care glucose testing: effects of critical care variables, influence of reference instruments, and a modular glucose meter design. Louie RF; Tang Z; Sutton DV; Lee JH; Kost GJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 10656736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory Evaluation of Linearity, Repeatability, and Hematocrit Interference With an Internet-Enabled Blood Glucose Meter. Demircik F; Kirsch V; Ramljak S; Vogg M; Pfützner AH; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 30974988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices. Demircik F; Ramljak S; Hermanns I; Pfützner A; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 25549636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hematocrit interference of blood glucose meters for patient self-measurement. Ramljak S; Lock JP; Schipper C; Musholt PB; Forst T; Lyon M; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 23439176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glutest Neo Super--a new handheld blood glucose meter-corrects for the effects of the hematocrit values in both hematocrit-adjusted samples and samples obtained from anemic patients. Yakushiji F; Fujita H; Suzuki H; Joukyu R; Yasuda M; Terayama Y; Nagasawa K; Ohwada A; Taniguchi K; Fujiki K; Shimojo M; Kinoshita H Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Jun; 11(6):369-72. PubMed ID: 19459765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]