These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22769016)

  • 21. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation.
    Han L; Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Taylor Z; Mertzanidou T; Cardoso J; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 57(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 22173131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient-specific Deformation Modelling via Elastography: Application to Image-guided Prostate Interventions.
    Wang Y; Ni D; Qin J; Xu M; Xie X; Heng PA
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27386. PubMed ID: 27272239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analytical derivation of elasticity in breast phantoms for deformation tracking.
    Groenhuis V; Visentin F; Siepel FJ; Maris BM; Dall'alba D; Fiorini P; Stramigioli S
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 29869320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coupling of fluid and elastic models for biomechanical simulations of brain deformations using FEM.
    Hagemann A; Rohr K; Stiehl HS
    Med Image Anal; 2002 Dec; 6(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 12426110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
    Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.
    Tanner C; Schnabel JA; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ; Leach MO; Hose DR
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1758-69. PubMed ID: 16872083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of accuracy of non-linear finite element computations for surgical simulation: study using brain phantom.
    Ma J; Wittek A; Singh S; Joldes G; Washio T; Chinzei K; Miller K
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Dec; 13(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 21153973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element based bladder modeling for image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer.
    Chai X; van Herk M; van de Kamer JB; Hulshof MC; Remeijer P; Lotz HT; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 21361183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tomography-based 3-D anisotropic elastography using boundary measurements.
    Liu Y; Sun LZ; Wang G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1323-33. PubMed ID: 16229418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
    Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation.
    Alterovitz R; Goldberg K; Pouliot J; Hsu IC; Kim Y; Noworolski SM; Kurhanewicz J
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):446-54. PubMed ID: 16532952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite element modelling and validation for breast cancer detection using digital image elasto-tomography.
    Ismail HM; Pretty CG; Signal MK; Haggers M; Chase JG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Sep; 56(9):1715-1729. PubMed ID: 29524117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Comparison of Finite Element-Based Inversion Algorithms, Local Frequency Estimation, and Direct Inversion Approach Used in MRE.
    Honarvar M; Sahebjavaher RS; Rohling R; Salcudean SE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1686-1698. PubMed ID: 28333623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system.
    Bax J; Cool D; Gardi L; Knight K; Smith D; Montreuil J; Sherebrin S; Romagnoli C; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5397-410. PubMed ID: 19175099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elastic registration of prostate MR images based on estimation of deformation states.
    Marami B; Sirouspour S; Ghoul S; Cepek J; Davidson SR; Capson DW; Trachtenberg J; Fenster A
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 25624044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations.
    Ahn B; Kim J
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 19948423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data.
    Samani A; Bishop J; Yaffe MJ; Plewes DB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 11370894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite-element biomechanical model.
    Ferrant M; Nabavi A; Macq B; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R; Warfield SK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1384-97. PubMed ID: 11811838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation.
    Chai X; van Herk M; Hulshof MC; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 22225275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sparsity regularization in dynamic elastography.
    Honarvar M; Sahebjavaher RS; Salcudean SE; Rohling R
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(19):5909-27. PubMed ID: 22955065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.