BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22770616)

  • 1. Pathologic findings in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients eligible for active surveillance with highly selective criteria: a multicenter study.
    Beauval JB; Ploussard G; Soulié M; Pfister C; Van Agt S; Vincendeau S; Larue S; Rigaud J; Gaschignard N; Rouprêt M; Drouin S; Peyromaure M; Long JA; Iborra F; Vallancien G; Rozet F; Salomon L;
    Urology; 2012 Sep; 80(3):656-60. PubMed ID: 22770616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The risk of upstaged disease increases with body mass index in low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
    Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Bayoud Y; Durand X; Terry S; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 21803484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved biochemical outcome with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with poor pathologic features.
    Vargas C; Kestin LL; Weed DW; Krauss D; Vicini FA; Martinez AA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):714-24. PubMed ID: 15708249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
    El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance--does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria?
    Ploussard G; Salomon L; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 20006888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.
    Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Manoharan M; Jorda M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22445138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncologic control obtained after radical prostatectomy in men with a pathological Gleason score ≥ 8: a single-center experience.
    Audenet F; Comperat E; Seringe E; Drouin SJ; Richard F; Cussenot O; Bitker MO; Rouprêt M
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 19926312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
    Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy.
    Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Cussenot O; Bitker MO; Haertig A; Rouprêt M
    Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20884256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pathologic outcomes of candidates for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Mufarrij P; Sankin A; Godoy G; Lepor H
    Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):689-92. PubMed ID: 20494409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
    Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
    J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of anatomopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimen of patients who answer to criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer].
    Azancot V; Peyromaure M; Xylinas E; Descazeaud A; Cornud F; Vieillefond A; Saighi D; Amsellem-Ouazana D; Debré B; Zerbib M
    Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):619-23. PubMed ID: 19800552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort.
    Seiler D; Randazzo M; Klotz L; Grobholz R; Baumgartner M; Isbarn H; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22093744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
    Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging does not improve the prediction of misclassification of prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance when the most stringent selection criteria are based on the saturation biopsy scheme.
    Ploussard G; Xylinas E; Durand X; Ouzaïd I; Allory Y; Bouanane M; Abbou CC; Salomon L; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 21176083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.