141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22770807)
1. DISCRISET: a battery of tests for fast waste classification--application of tests on waste extracts.
Deprez K; Robbens J; Nobels I; Vanparys C; Vanermen G; Tirez K; Michiels L; Weltens R
Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2218-28. PubMed ID: 22770807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening tests for hazard classification of complex waste materials--selection of methods.
Weltens R; Vanermen G; Tirez K; Robbens J; Deprez K; Michiels L
Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2208-17. PubMed ID: 22917872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Microtox as a first screening tool for waste classification.
Weltens R; Deprez K; Michiels L
Waste Manag; 2014 Dec; 34(12):2427-33. PubMed ID: 25241005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of biological methods for a future methodological implementation of the Hazard criterion H14 'ecotoxic' in the European waste list (2000/532/EC).
Moser H; Roembke J; Donnevert G; Becker R
Waste Manag Res; 2011 Feb; 29(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 20430803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hazard property classification of waste according to the recent propositions of the EC using different methods.
Hennebert P; van der Sloot HA; Rebischung F; Weltens R; Geerts L; Hjelmar O
Waste Manag; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1739-51. PubMed ID: 24994468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a novel battery of bioassays for the biological characterisation of hazardous wastes.
Pablos MV; Fernández C; del Mar Babín M; María Navas J; Carbonell G; Martini F; García-Hortigüela P; Vicente Tarazona J
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jul; 72(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 19217160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An ecotoxicological approach for hazard identification of energy ash.
Stiernström S; Hemström K; Wik O; Carlsson G; Bengtsson BE; Breitholtz M
Waste Manag; 2011 Feb; 31(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 20584596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of solid-phase and eluate assays to gauge the ecotoxicological risk of organic wastes on soil organisms.
Domene X; Alcañiz JM; Andrés P
Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):549-58. PubMed ID: 17532103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toxicity testing and chemical analyses of recycled fibre-based paper for food contact.
Binderup ML; Pedersen GA; Vinggaard AM; Rasmussen ES; Rosenquist H; Cederberg T
Food Addit Contam; 2002; 19 Suppl():13-28. PubMed ID: 11962701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of chemical and ecotoxicological characteristics of biodegradable organic residues for application to agricultural land.
Alvarenga P; Palma P; Gonçalves AP; Fernandes RM; Cunha-Queda AC; Duarte E; Vallini G
Environ Int; 2007 May; 33(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 17188749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting a battery of bioassays for ecotoxicological characterization of wastes.
Pandard P; Devillers J; Charissou AM; Poulsen V; Jourdain MJ; Férard JF; Grand C; Bispo A
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jun; 363(1-3):114-25. PubMed ID: 16545863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioassays for the evaluation of landfill leachate toxicity.
Thomas DJ; Tyrrel SF; Smith R; Farrow S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2009 Jan; 12(1):83-105. PubMed ID: 19117211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An enhanced tiered toxicity testing framework with triggers for assessing hazards and risks of commodity chemicals.
Plunkett LM; Kaplan AM; Becker RA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 20709129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposal for a "Harmonized" strategy for the assessment of the HP 14 property.
Pandard P; Römbke J
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 23633289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The environmental risks of industrial waste disposal: an experimental approach including acute and chronic toxicity studies.
Lambolez L; Vasseur P; Ferard JF; Gisbert T
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1994 Aug; 28(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 7525226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the toxicity of river and creek sediments in Hungary with two different methods.
Torokne A; Toro K
Environ Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 25(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 20549625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ecotoxicological assessment and evaluation of a pine bark biosorbent treatment of five landfill leachates.
Ribé V; Nehrenheim E; Odlare M; Gustavsson L; Berglind R; Forsberg A
Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1886-94. PubMed ID: 22703999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toxicity profiling: An integrated effect-based tool for site-specific sediment quality assessment.
Hamers T; Leonards PE; Legler J; Vethaak AD; Schipper CA
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 20872654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
