These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22770865)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a radiofrequency detection system as an adjunct to manual counting protocols for tracking surgical sponges: a prospective trial of 2,285 patients.
    Rupp CC; Kagarise MJ; Nelson SM; Deal AM; Phillips S; Chadwick J; Petty T; Meyer AA; Kim HJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 215(4):524-33. PubMed ID: 22770865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: a randomized controlled trial.
    Greenberg CC; Diaz-Flores R; Lipsitz SR; Regenbogen SE; Mulholland L; Mearn F; Rao S; Toidze T; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 18362623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
    Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
    Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study.
    Steelman VM
    Am J Surg; 2011 Feb; 201(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 21266216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back to Basics: Counting Soft Surgical Goods.
    Spruce L
    AORN J; 2016 Mar; 103(3):298-301; quiz 302-3. PubMed ID: 26924368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.
    Gawande AA; Studdert DM; Orav EJ; Brennan TA; Zinner MJ
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 12529464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retained surgical items: a problem yet to be solved.
    Stawicki SP; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Ahmed HM; Anderson HL; Balija TM; Bernescu I; Chan L; Chowayou L; Cipolla J; Coyle SM; Gracias VH; Gunter OL; Marchigiani R; Martin ND; Patel J; Seamon MJ; Vagedes E; Ellison EC; Steinberg SM; Cook CH
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Jan; 216(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 23041050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural history of retained surgical items supports the need for team training, early recognition, and prompt retrieval.
    Stawicki SP; Cook CH; Anderson HL; Chowayou L; Cipolla J; Ahmed HM; Coyle SM; Gracias VH; Evans DC; Marchigiani R; Adams RC; Seamon MJ; Martin ND; Steinberg SM; Moffatt-Bruce SD;
    Am J Surg; 2014 Jul; 208(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 24524864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of radiofrequency scanning technology in preventing retained surgical items: An integrative review.
    Peng J; Ang SY; Zhou H; Nair A
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 Jul; 32(13-14):3315-3327. PubMed ID: 35818318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a data-matrix-coded sponge counting system across a surgical practice: impact after 18 months.
    Cima RR; Kollengode A; Clark J; Pool S; Weisbrod C; Amstutz GJ; Deschamps C
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2011 Feb; 37(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 21939132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
    Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
    Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
    Bardes JM; Inaba K
    Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A serious medicolegal problem after surgery: gossypiboma.
    Gümüş M; Gümüş H; Kapan M; Onder A; Tekbaş G; Baç B
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21562399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system.
    Moffatt-Bruce SD; Cook CH; Steinberg SM; Stawicki SP
    J Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 190(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 24953990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk Reduction Strategy to Decrease Incidence of Retained Surgical Items.
    Kaplan HJ; Spiera ZC; Feldman DL; Shamamian P; Portnoy B; Ioannides P; Leitman IM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Sep; 235(3):494-499. PubMed ID: 35972170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments.
    Hariharan D; Lobo DN
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2013 Mar; 95(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23484986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.