310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22771403)
1. Surgery-first approach on patients with temporomandibular joint disease by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):e429-36. PubMed ID: 22771403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up.
Kim JY; Jung HD; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study.
Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Takagi R; Saito C; Saito I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1424-32; discussion 1432-4. PubMed ID: 12465004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.
Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term orthodontic and surgical treatment and stability of a patient with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
Hikita R; Kobayashi Y; Tsuji M; Kawamoto T; Moriyama K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):672-84. PubMed ID: 24785932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical-orthodontic correction of a skeletal Class III malocclusion with severe maxillary constriction.
Wang Y; Liu M; Zhou L; Hu J
J Clin Orthod; 2013 Oct; 47(10):595-602. PubMed ID: 24225165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Procedure and Technique.
McKenna SJ; King EE
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2016 Mar; 24(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 26847511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation.
Takahara N; Kabasawa Y; Sato M; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T; Omura K
Cranio; 2017 Jan; 35(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 27077250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Condylar and disc positions after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Nakgawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17239565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
