These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22772149)

  • 41. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
    Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
    Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detection of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography.
    Murakami R; Kumita S; Tani H; Yoshida T; Sugizaki K; Kuwako T; Kiriyama T; Hakozaki K; Okazaki E; Yanagihara K; Iida S; Haga S; Tsuchiya S
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Aug; 26(4):768-73. PubMed ID: 23319110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers.
    Sadaf A; Crystal P; Scaranelo A; Helbich T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Range of Radiologist Performance in a Population-based Screening Cohort of 1 Million Digital Mammography Examinations.
    Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 32720866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
    Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Does computer-aided detection assist in the early detection of breast cancer?
    Hukkinen K; Pamilo M
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Apr; 46(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15902887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiologists' detection of mammographic abnormalities with and without a computer-aided detection system.
    Quek ST; Thng CH; Khoo JB; Koh WL
    Australas Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 12890245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
    Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Retrospective analysis of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system in full-field digital mammography in correlation to tumor histology].
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1103-9. PubMed ID: 16021542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
    Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer.
    Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
    Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.