These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2277233)
1. Contingent fees and medical-legal consulting services. Economical or unethical? Dillon MM J Leg Med; 1990 Mar; 11(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 2277233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Contingent fees and medical expenses. Blakeslee J Wis Med J; 1969 Jan; 68(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 5763395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Should plaintiffs' experts get contingency fees? Crane M Med Econ; 1997 Oct; 74(20):58-60, 65. PubMed ID: 10174063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On frivolity and the malpractice cafeteria. A crisis contingent on lawyers' fees. Edwards FJ Group Pract J; 1989; 38(1):20-2, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10292130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics in medicine and law: standards and conflicts. Norton ML Leg Med Annu; 1977; ():201-15. PubMed ID: 593037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert witness travel dilemmas: a pilot study of billing practices. Gutheil TG; Slater FE; Commons ML; Goodheart EA J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9554706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When does a medical expert become a hired gun? Rice B Med Econ; 1993 Jun; 70(12):32-6, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10126601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert witness billing practices revisited: a pilot study of further data. Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Miller PM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 11471787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comments on ethical guidelines editorial. Warshauer AD N C Med J; 1989 Sep; 50(9):514. PubMed ID: 2601751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Complaints about fees and costs for medical records and depositions. Marshall TM; Ballantine JT J Ky Med Assoc; 1988 Oct; 86(10):587. PubMed ID: 3225515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The contingent fee: disciplinary rule, ethical consideration, or free competition? Busath LE Dent Clin North Am; 1982 Apr; 26(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7040129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374: Expert testimony. Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):445-6. PubMed ID: 17666622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical and legal malpractice: professional problems and cooperation. Zaslow J J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Oct; 4(9):8AA-8EE. PubMed ID: 1085805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The phantom expert: unconsented use of an expert's name and/or testimony, as a legal strategy. Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Hilliard JT J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 11592459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Compensation of medical experts in civil law proceedings]. Louven K MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1983 Mar; 125(12):84-5 concl. PubMed ID: 6406849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The medical expert witness in malpractice suits. Bucy PC JAMA; 1975 Jun; 232(13):1352-3. PubMed ID: 1173400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Increased compensation for legal experts. Decision of the Lower Saxony-Bremen Federal Social Court 27 January 2003--L 4 SF 17/02]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jul; 128(28-29):1560-1. PubMed ID: 12854070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]