588 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22772577)
1. Reliability of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods in the assessment of spinal canal stenosis and cord compression in cervical myelopathy.
Karpova A; Arun R; Davis AM; Kulkarni AV; Mikulis DJ; Sooyong C; Rabin D; Craciunas S; Smith SR; Hansen MA; George J; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 22772577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.
Fehlings MG; Furlan JC; Massicotte EM; Arnold P; Aarabi B; Harrop J; Anderson DG; Bono CM; Dvorak M; Fisher C; France J; Hedlund R; Madrazo I; Nockels R; Rampersaud R; Rechtine G; Vaccaro AR;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1719-25. PubMed ID: 16816769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability.
Furlan JC; Fehlings MG; Massicotte EM; Aarabi B; Vaccaro AR; Bono CM; Madrazo I; Villanueva C; Grauer JN; Mikulis D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of MRI quantitative measurements to assess spinal cord compression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study.
Karpova A; Craciunas S; Chua SY; Rabin D; Smith S; Fehlings MG
Evid Based Spine Care J; 2010 Aug; 1(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 23637669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis.
Rüegg TB; Wicki AG; Aebli N; Wisianowsky C; Krebs J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: Results of a multicenter study.
Fehlings MG; Rao SC; Tator CH; Skaf G; Arnold P; Benzel E; Dickman C; Cuddy B; Green B; Hitchon P; Northrup B; Sonntag V; Wagner F; Wilberger J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Mar; 24(6):605-13. PubMed ID: 10101829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Preoperative Clinical Presentation and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Nouri A; Tetreault L; Dalzell K; Zamorano JJ; Fehlings MG
Neurosurgery; 2017 Jan; 80(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 27607403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between preoperative factors and the presence of intramedullary increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Wei L; Cao P; Xu C; Liu Y; Chen H; Wang X; Tian Y; Yuan W
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 178():1-6. PubMed ID: 30660852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility, temporal stability, and functional correlation of diffusion MR measurements within the spinal cord in patients with asymptomatic cervical stenosis or cervical myelopathy.
Ellingson BM; Salamon N; Woodworth DC; Yokota H; Holly LT
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):472-480. PubMed ID: 29424671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients.
Miyanji F; Furlan JC; Aarabi B; Arnold PM; Fehlings MG
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 17431129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of radiological descriptions of spinal cord compression with quantitative measures, and their role in non-specialist clinical management.
Tempest-Mitchell J; Hilton B; Davies BM; Nouri A; Hutchinson PJ; Scoffings DJ; Mannion RJ; Trivedi R; Timofeev I; Crawford JR; Hay D; Laing RJ; Kotter MRN
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219380. PubMed ID: 31329621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters correlate with the clinical presentation and functional outcomes after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A prospective multicenter study.
Karpova A; Arun R; Kalsi-Ryan S; Massicotte EM; Kopjar B; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(18):1488-97. PubMed ID: 24859570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques.
Nouri A; Martin AR; Mikulis D; Fehlings MG
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jun; 40(6):E5. PubMed ID: 27246488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Outcome in Cervical Spine Degenerative Conditions.
Grochmal JK; Lozen AM; Klein AP; Mark LP; Li J; Wang MC
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():e215-e220. PubMed ID: 29913296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Harrop JS; Naroji S; Maltenfort M; Anderson DG; Albert T; Ratliff JK; Ponnappan RK; Rihn JA; Smith HE; Hilibrand A; Sharan AD; Vaccaro A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 20150835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part I: An evidence-based analysis of the published literature.
Rao SC; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Mar; 24(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 10101828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification of measurements of lumbar spinal dimensions in T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences.
Cheung JP; Shigematsu H; Cheung KM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1476-83. PubMed ID: 24314906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of clinical results of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy focusing on spinal cord motion in intraoperative ultrasonography and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Naruse T; Yanase M; Takahashi H; Horie Y; Ito M; Imaizumi T; Oguri K; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2634-41. PubMed ID: 19910766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of degenerative cervical stenosis on T2-weighted MR imaging: sensitivity to change and reliability of mid-sagittal and axial plane metrics.
Sritharan K; Chamoli U; Kuan J; Diwan AD
Spinal Cord; 2020 Feb; 58(2):238-246. PubMed ID: 31558777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Observer agreement of spine stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging analysis of patients with cervical spine myelopathy.
Cook C; Braga-Baiak A; Pietrobon R; Shah A; Neto AC; de Barros N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 18486747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
