These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773131)

  • 1. Biodegradation kinetic constants and sorption coefficients of micropollutants in membrane bioreactors.
    Fernandez-Fontaina E; Pinho I; Carballa M; Omil F; Lema JM
    Biodegradation; 2013 Apr; 24(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 22773131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
    Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment.
    De Wever H; Weiss S; Reemtsma T; Vereecken J; Müller J; Knepper T; Rörden O; Gonzalez S; Barcelo D; Dolores Hernando M
    Water Res; 2007 Feb; 41(4):935-45. PubMed ID: 17207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biodegradation and toxicity of melamine at high activated sludge concentrations in a membrane bioreactor.
    Xu S; Sun M; Thompson A; Hu Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):979-987. PubMed ID: 29488961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adsorption and removal at low atrazine concentration in an MBR pilot plant.
    Buttiglieri G; Migliorisi L; Malpei F
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(7):1334-40. PubMed ID: 21508534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbial adaptation to biodegrade toxic organic micro-pollutants in membrane bioreactor using different sludge sources.
    Boonnorat J; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Yamamoto K
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():50-9. PubMed ID: 24791712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of trace organic contaminants by an MBR comprising a mixed culture of bacteria and white-rot fungi.
    Nguyen LN; Hai FI; Yang S; Kang J; Leusch FD; Roddick F; Price WE; Nghiem LD
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 148():234-41. PubMed ID: 24050925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Membrane bioreactor operation at short solids retention times: performance and biomass characteristics.
    Ng HY; Hermanowicz SW
    Water Res; 2005 Mar; 39(6):981-92. PubMed ID: 15766953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.
    Liang Z; Das A; Beerman D; Hu Z
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of quinolone antibiotics from wastewaters by sorption and biological degradation in laboratory-scale membrane bioreactors.
    Dorival-García N; Zafra-Gómez A; Navalón A; González J; Vílchez JL
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 442():317-28. PubMed ID: 23178836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethinylestradiol removal in a conventional and a simultaneous nitrification-denitrification membrane bioreactor.
    Paetkau M; Yang W; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(12):2333-7. PubMed ID: 22170824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seasonal variation in the occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in different biological wastewater treatment processes.
    Sui Q; Huang J; Deng S; Chen W; Yu G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(8):3341-8. PubMed ID: 21428396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodegradation and Metabolism of Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the Bioaugmented Activated Sludge Batch Bioreactor System by Heterotrophic and Nitrifying Bacteria.
    Islam MS; Zhou H; Zytner RG
    Water Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 90(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29348000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of nitrifying conditions on the biodegradation and sorption of emerging micropollutants.
    Fernandez-Fontaina E; Omil F; Lema JM; Carballa M
    Water Res; 2012 Oct; 46(16):5434-44. PubMed ID: 22877882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The application of membrane bioreactors as decentralised systems for removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
    Le-Minh N; Coleman HM; Khan SJ; van Luer Y; Trang TT; Watkins G; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(5):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20220228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal and degradation characteristics of quinolone antibiotics in laboratory-scale activated sludge reactors under aerobic, nitrifying and anoxic conditions.
    Dorival-García N; Zafra-Gómez A; Navalón A; González-López J; Hontoria E; Vílchez JL
    J Environ Manage; 2013 May; 120():75-83. PubMed ID: 23507246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of biogenic substrate concentration on 4-chlorophenol degradation kinetics in sequencing batch reactors with instantaneous feed.
    Sahinkaya E; Dilek FB
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Sep; 137(1):282-7. PubMed ID: 16530946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.