BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773330)

  • 1. Can Chlamydia screening in the Emergency Department reach a different section of the target population?
    Stanley L; Ellks R
    Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Nov; 88(7):551. PubMed ID: 22773330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poor uptake of self-sample collection kits for Chlamydia testing outside primary care.
    Rose SB; Lawton BA; Bromhead C; MacDonald EJ; Elley CR
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2010 Oct; 34(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 21040182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Yes wee can' - a nurse-driven asymptomatic screening program for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in a remote emergency department.
    Mossenson A; Algie K; Olding M; Garton L; Reeve C
    Sex Health; 2012 May; 9(2):194-5. PubMed ID: 22498167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
    Dekker JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chlamydia screening project starts in Nova Gorica, Slovenia.
    Frelih T
    Euro Surveill; 2005 Jun; 10(6):E050609.3. PubMed ID: 16783097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Chlamydia: from population screening to individual repeated screening].
    Bally F; Quach A
    Rev Med Suisse; 2014 Oct; 10(445):1882, 1884-6. PubMed ID: 25417359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing the uptake of opportunistic chlamydia screening: a pilot study in general practice.
    Lawton BA; Rose SB; Elley CR; Bromhead C; MacDonald EJ; Baker MG
    J Prim Health Care; 2010 Sep; 2(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 21069115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chlamydia screening in a rural population: access, outcomes and health-care planning.
    Bendall RP; Keane FE; Barlow MJ; Paynter SJ
    Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Feb; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 17331278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling screening and diagnostic Chlamydia test positivity among females testing at title x-funded and adolescent health clinics, san francisco 2009.
    Stephens SC; Snell A; Liska S; Rauch L; Philip SS; Bernstein KT
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jul; 38(7):630-3. PubMed ID: 21301386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low rate of syphilis screening among high-risk emergency department patients tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia infections.
    White DA; Alter HJ; Irvin NA; Clark MC; Frazee BW
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Apr; 39(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 22421695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening: what are we trying to do?
    Peterman TA; Gottlieb SL; Berman SM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 38(2):449-51. PubMed ID: 19174542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emergency prevention: the benefit of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in urban emergency departments.
    Zampini AN
    J Emerg Nurs; 2010 May; 36(3):246-7. PubMed ID: 20457322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlamydia screening in Wellington Family Planning Association (FPA) clinics: a demonstration project.
    Sparrow M; Lewis H; Brown P; Bromhead C; Fernando D; Maitra A
    N Z Med J; 2007 Apr; 120(1252):U2490. PubMed ID: 17460740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
    Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of mathematical modeling to inform Chlamydia screening policy decisions.
    Low N; Heijne JC; Kretzschmar M
    J Infect Dis; 2009 Mar; 199(5):767-8; author reply 768-9. PubMed ID: 19210168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department.
    Sood T; Sally D; Spencer N; Banerjee A; Hinchley G
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Jul; 25(7):428-30. PubMed ID: 18573958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency department Chlamydia screening through partnership with the public health department.
    Irvin CB; Nowak B; Moore M; Flynn K; Vretta C
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1217-20. PubMed ID: 19814759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.
    Gillespie P; O'Neill C; Adams E; Turner K; O'Donovan D; Brugha R; Vaughan D; O'Connell E; Cormican M; Balfe M; Coleman C; Fitzgerald M; Fleming C
    Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Apr; 88(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 22213681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.