These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773505)
1. Effect of restoration of combined offset on stability of large head THA. Robinson M; Bornstein L; Mennear B; Bostrom M; Nestor B; Padgett D; Westrich G Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 22773505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-mobility or Constrained Liners Are More Effective Than Preoperative Bariatric Surgery in Prevention of THA Dislocation. Hernigou P; Trousselier M; Roubineau F; Bouthors C; Flouzat Lachaniette CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2202-10. PubMed ID: 27130648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors. Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large Femoral Heads and Select Dual-Mobility Bearings Are Associated With Reduced Instability in Contemporary Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. Pitz-Gonçalves LI; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S124-S130. PubMed ID: 36791889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion of Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing a Dual-Mobility Construct Compared With Large Femoral Heads. Chalmers BP; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3071-3075. PubMed ID: 28579448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Dual Mobility Versus Jumbo Femoral Heads. Beckert M; Meneghini RM; Meding JB J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S571-S576. PubMed ID: 35271976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing decrease the rate of dislocation after THA? Lee YK; Ha YC; Jo WL; Kim TY; Jung WH; Koo KH J Orthop Sci; 2016 May; 21(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 26876620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip replacement through a posterior approach using a 22 mm diameter femoral head : the role of the transverse acetabular ligament and capsular repair in reducing the rate of dislocation. Kumar V; Sharma S; James J; Hodgkinson JP; Hemmady MV Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1202-6. PubMed ID: 25183591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair. Hummel MT; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Baker DL J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):73-6. PubMed ID: 19577890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative head size increase using an anatomic dual mobility hip prosthesis compared to traditional hip arthroplasty: impact on hip stability. D'Apuzzo MR; Nevelos J; Yeager A; Westrich GH J Arthroplasty; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1854-6. PubMed ID: 24997653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. Peters CL; McPherson E; Jackson JD; Erickson JA J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6 Suppl 2):140-4. PubMed ID: 17823033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. De Fine M; Romagnoli M; Toscano A; Bondi A; Nanni M; Zaffagnini S Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 28159679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decreased Instability in High-Risk (Hip-Spine 2B) Patients After Modifications of Surgical Planning and Technique. Karasavvidis T; Pagan CA; Sharma AK; Jerabek SA; Mayman DJ; Vigdorchik JM J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S1):S138-S144. PubMed ID: 38642849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty? Haughom BD; Plummer DR; Moric M; Della Valle CJ J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jan; 31(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 26360768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Bistolfi A; Crova M; Rosso F; Titolo P; Ventura S; Massazza G Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 21948039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large diameter heads: is bigger always better? Rodriguez JA; Rathod PA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):52-4. PubMed ID: 23118381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prevention of prothesis dislocation after the revision of total hip arthroplasty]. Li YJ; Zhang LC; Yang GJ; Zhang CC; Wang WL; Lin RX; Cai CY Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Mar; 21(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 19105429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size. Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES; Martell JM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 25903943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative evaluation of the effects of femoral component offset and head size on joint stability in total hip arthroplasty. Jinno T; Koga D; Asou Y; Morita S; Okawa A; Muneta T J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017 Jan; 25(1):2309499016684298. PubMed ID: 28741411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]