212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773522)
1. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review.
Moloney NA; Hall TM; Doody CM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults.
Moloney NA; Hall TM; O'Sullivan TC; Doody CM
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Oct; 44(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 21826684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest reliability of Quantitative Sensory Testing in knee osteoarthritis and healthy participants.
Wylde V; Palmer S; Learmonth ID; Dieppe P
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2011 Jun; 19(6):655-8. PubMed ID: 21329759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing.
Heldestad V; Linder J; Sellersjö L; Nordh E
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1878-85. PubMed ID: 20478739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Replicate effects and test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory threshold testing in dogs with and without chronic pain.
Knazovicky D; Helgeson ES; Case B; Thomson A; Gruen ME; Maixner W; Lascelles BDX
Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 May; 44(3):615-624. PubMed ID: 28528759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?
Cruz-Almeida Y; Fillingim RB
Pain Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 24010588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement variability of quantitative sensory testing in persons with post-stroke shoulder pain.
Lindgren I; Ekstrand E; Brogårdh C
J Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 48(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 27097884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
Felix ER; Widerström-Noga EG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 19533521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
Geber C; Klein T; Azad S; Birklein F; Gierthmühlen J; Huge V; Lauchart M; Nitzsche D; Stengel M; Valet M; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD
Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of perception threshold testing and thermal-vibratory testing.
Lowenstein L; Jesse K; Kenton K
Muscle Nerve; 2008 Apr; 37(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 18067137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
Zhu GC; Böttger K; Slater H; Cook C; Farrell SF; Hailey L; Tampin B; Schmid AB
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative sensory testing of temperature thresholds: Possible biomarkers for persistent pain?
Malmström EM; Stjerna J; Högestätt ED; Westergren H
J Rehabil Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 26450179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain.
Jääskeläinen SK; Teerijoki-Oksa T; Forssell H
Pain; 2005 Oct; 117(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 16153774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
