These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773522)

  • 1. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: a systematic review.
    Moloney NA; Hall TM; Doody CM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):191-207. PubMed ID: 22773522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults.
    Moloney NA; Hall TM; O'Sullivan TC; Doody CM
    Muscle Nerve; 2011 Oct; 44(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 21826684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
    Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
    Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of Quantitative Sensory Testing in knee osteoarthritis and healthy participants.
    Wylde V; Palmer S; Learmonth ID; Dieppe P
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2011 Jun; 19(6):655-8. PubMed ID: 21329759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing.
    Heldestad V; Linder J; Sellersjö L; Nordh E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Nov; 121(11):1878-85. PubMed ID: 20478739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
    Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Replicate effects and test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory threshold testing in dogs with and without chronic pain.
    Knazovicky D; Helgeson ES; Case B; Thomson A; Gruen ME; Maixner W; Lascelles BDX
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 May; 44(3):615-624. PubMed ID: 28528759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can quantitative sensory testing move us closer to mechanism-based pain management?
    Cruz-Almeida Y; Fillingim RB
    Pain Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 24010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement variability of quantitative sensory testing in persons with post-stroke shoulder pain.
    Lindgren I; Ekstrand E; Brogårdh C
    J Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 48(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 27097884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain.
    Felix ER; Widerström-Noga EG
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 19533521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
    Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
    Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
    Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
    Geber C; Klein T; Azad S; Birklein F; Gierthmühlen J; Huge V; Lauchart M; Nitzsche D; Stengel M; Valet M; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD
    Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of perception threshold testing and thermal-vibratory testing.
    Lowenstein L; Jesse K; Kenton K
    Muscle Nerve; 2008 Apr; 37(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 18067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
    Zhu GC; Böttger K; Slater H; Cook C; Farrell SF; Hailey L; Tampin B; Schmid AB
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative sensory testing of temperature thresholds: Possible biomarkers for persistent pain?
    Malmström EM; Stjerna J; Högestätt ED; Westergren H
    J Rehabil Med; 2016 Jan; 48(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 26450179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain.
    Jääskeläinen SK; Teerijoki-Oksa T; Forssell H
    Pain; 2005 Oct; 117(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 16153774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.