212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773522)
21. Quantitative Sensory Testing in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.
Uddin Z; MacDermid JC
Pain Med; 2016 Sep; 17(9):1694-703. PubMed ID: 26893116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.
Gröne E; Crispin A; Fleckenstein J; Irnich D; Treede RD; Lang PM
J Pain; 2012 Jan; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 22208803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.
Rolke R; Magerl W; Campbell KA; Schalber C; Caspari S; Birklein F; Treede RD
Eur J Pain; 2006 Jan; 10(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 16291301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability study of thermal quantitative sensory testing in healthy Chinese.
Wang R; Cui L; Zhou W; Wang C; Zhang J; Wang K; Svensson P
Somatosens Mot Res; 2014 Dec; 31(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 24945099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of Sensory Thresholds in Dogs using Mechanical and Hot Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing.
Cunningham RM; Park RM; Knazovicky D; Lascelles BDX; Gruen ME
J Vis Exp; 2021 Oct; (176):. PubMed ID: 34779443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects.
Wasner GL; Brock JA
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2389-95. PubMed ID: 18778969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-, gender- and body site-specific reference values of thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Italian population using the Q-sense device.
Cosentino G; Antoniazzi E; Bonomi L; Cavigioli C; D'Agostino M; Todisco M; Tassorelli C
Neurol Sci; 2023 Dec; 44(12):4481-4489. PubMed ID: 37450073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of a Brazilian quantitative sensory testing (QST) device for the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathies.
Schestatsky P; Stefani LC; Sanches PR; Silva Júnior DP; Torres IL; Dall-Agnol L; Balbinot LF; Caumo W
Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2011 Dec; 69(6):943-8. PubMed ID: 22297885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Verbal instructions influence pain thresholds assessment: A study using manual and electronic mechanical stimulators.
Suzuki K; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P
Eur J Pain; 2017 May; 21(5):900-906. PubMed ID: 28106324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.
Baad-Hansen L; Pigg M; Yang G; List T; Svensson P; Drangsholt M
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 42(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 25284726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory testing for mechanical somatosensory and pain modulation assessment of masticatory structures.
Costa YM; Morita-Neto O; de Araújo-Júnior EN; Sampaio FA; Conti PC; Bonjardim LR
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 44(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 28008644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technology literature review: quantitative sensory testing.
Chong PS; Cros DP
Muscle Nerve; 2004 May; 29(5):734-47. PubMed ID: 15116380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative sensory testing and structural assessment of sensory nerve fibres in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Isak B; Pugdahl K; Karlsson P; Tankisi H; Finnerup NB; Furtula J; Johnsen B; Sunde N; Jakobsen J; Fuglsang-Frederiksen A
J Neurol Sci; 2017 Feb; 373():329-334. PubMed ID: 28131214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tactile and thermal detection thresholds of the scalp skin.
Mehrabyan A; Guest S; Essick G; McGlone F
Somatosens Mot Res; 2011; 28(3-4):31-47. PubMed ID: 21879989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative sensory testing of patients with long lasting Patellofemoral pain syndrome.
Jensen R; Hystad T; Kvale A; Baerheim A
Eur J Pain; 2007 Aug; 11(6):665-76. PubMed ID: 17204440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative sensory testing in measurement of neuropathic pain phenomena and other sensory abnormalities.
Backonja MM; Walk D; Edwards RR; Sehgal N; Moeller-Bertram T; Wasan A; Irving G; Argoff C; Wallace M
Clin J Pain; 2009 Sep; 25(7):641-7. PubMed ID: 19692807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of quantitative sensory testing in cancer pain assessment: A systematic review.
Martland ME; Rashidi AS; Bennett MI; Fallon M; Jones C; Rolke R; Mulvey MR
Eur J Pain; 2020 Apr; 24(4):669-684. PubMed ID: 31823467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability of quantitative sensory testing in the assessment of somatosensory function after high-frequency stimulation-induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways.
Fawsitt-Jones H; Vollert J; O'Daly O; Williams SCR; McMahon SB; Howard MA; Hughes SW
Pain; 2024 Apr; 165(4):941-950. PubMed ID: 37878469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative sensory testing in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Krassioukov A; Wolfe DL; Hsieh JT; Hayes KC; Durham CE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Oct; 80(10):1258-63. PubMed ID: 10527084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variation in quantitative sensory testing and epidermal nerve fiber density in repeated measurements.
Selim MM; Wendelschafer-Crabb G; Hodges JS; Simone DA; Foster SXY; Vanhove GF; Kennedy WR
Pain; 2010 Dec; 151(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 20851518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
