These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773670)

  • 1. Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems.
    Zaher AR; Abdalla EM; Abdel Motie MA; Rehman NA; Kassem H; Athanasiou AE
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 22773670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.
    Holzmeier M; Schaubmayr M; Dasch W; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):78-93. PubMed ID: 18385954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives.
    Trakyali G; Ozdemir FI; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 19460855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Garcia-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 10022184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.
    Vidor MM; Felix RP; Marchioro EM; Hahn L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 25992989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
    Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.
    Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study.
    Ramesh Kumar KR; Shanta Sundari KK; Venkatesan A; Chandrasekar S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 21967934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro bonding effectiveness of three different one-step self-etch adhesives with additional enamel etching.
    Batra C; Nagpal R; Tyagi SP; Singh UP; Manuja N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):226-36. PubMed ID: 23596010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding with self-etching primers--pumice or pre-etch? An in vitro study.
    Fitzgerald I; Bradley GT; Bosio JA; Hefti AF; Berzins DW
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 21300729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examination of enamel-adhesive interface with focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy.
    Vilchis RJ; Hotta Y; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 May; 131(5):646-50. PubMed ID: 17482085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel.
    Cal-Neto JP; Miguel JA
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 16448283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound dentin.
    Sundfeld RH; Valentino TA; de Alexandre RS; Briso AL; Sundefeld ML
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):675-81. PubMed ID: 16139699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of tooth bleaching on the enamel surface and the tensile force to debond orthodontic brackets.
    Mishima FD; Valentim RG; Araújo MT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 36(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 19934241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.