These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22773869)

  • 1. Identification of Breast Cancer Prognosis Markers via Integrative Analysis.
    Ma S; Dai Y; Huang J; Xie Y
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Sep; 56(9):2718-2728. PubMed ID: 22773869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.
    Ma S; Huang J; Xie Y; Yi N
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 22344268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of cancer genomic markers via integrative sparse boosting.
    Huang Y; Huang J; Shia BC; Ma S
    Biostatistics; 2012 Jul; 13(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 22045909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrative analysis and variable selection with multiple high-dimensional data sets.
    Ma S; Huang J; Song X
    Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):763-75. PubMed ID: 21415015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating network structure in integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 23161517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrative analysis of prognosis data on multiple cancer subtypes.
    Liu J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Lan Q; Rothman N; Zheng T; Ma S
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 24766212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrative analysis of high-throughput cancer studies with contrasted penalization.
    Shi X; Liu J; Huang J; Zhou Y; Shia B; Ma S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 38(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 24395534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.
    Huang Y; Liu J; Yi H; Shia BC; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(3):509-559. PubMed ID: 27667129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements.
    Ma S; Huang J; Wei F; Xie Y; Fang K
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3361-71. PubMed ID: 22105693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrative Analysis of Cancer Diagnosis Studies with Composite Penalization.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2014 Mar; 41(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 24578589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Promoting Similarity of Sparsity Structures in Integrative Analysis with Penalization.
    Huang Y; Zhang Q; Zhang S; Huang J; Ma S
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(517):342-350. PubMed ID: 30100648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of gene-environment interactions in cancer studies using penalization.
    Liu J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Lan Q; Rothman N; Zheng T; Ma S
    Genomics; 2013 Oct; 102(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 23994599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sparse group penalized integrative analysis of multiple cancer prognosis datasets.
    Liu J; Huang J; Xie Y; Ma S
    Genet Res (Camb); 2013 Jun; 95(2-3):68-77. PubMed ID: 23938111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrative prescreening in analysis of multiple cancer genomic studies.
    Song R; Huang J; Ma S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():168. PubMed ID: 22799431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrative analysis of multiple cancer genomic datasets under the heterogeneity model.
    Liu J; Huang J; Ma S
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3509-21. PubMed ID: 23519988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene network-based cancer prognosis analysis with sparse boosting.
    Ma S; Huang Y; Huang J; Fang K
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Aug; 94(4):205-21. PubMed ID: 22950901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.
    Sun Y; Sun Z; Jiang Y; Li Y; Ma S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1325-1337. PubMed ID: 31282286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable selection in the accelerated failure time model via the bridge method.
    Huang J; Ma S
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2010 Apr; 16(2):176-95. PubMed ID: 20013308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrative Analysis of Cancer Omics Data for Prognosis Modeling.
    Wang S; Wu M; Ma S
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31405076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying gene-environment interactions for prognosis using a robust approach.
    Chai H; Zhang Q; Jiang Y; Wang G; Zhang S; Ahmed SE; Ma S
    Econom Stat; 2017 Oct; 4():105-120. PubMed ID: 31157309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.