These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22774323)

  • 1. Comparison of load-fatigue performance of posterior ceramic onlay restorations under different preparation designs.
    Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois JC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Jun; 33 Spec No 2():2-9. PubMed ID: 22774323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers.
    Schmidt KK; Chiayabutr Y; Phillips KM; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):374-82. PubMed ID: 21640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.
    Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
    Stappert CF; Ozden U; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16046967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of load-fatigue testing of ceramic veneers with two different preparation designs.
    Chaiyabutr Y; Phillips KM; Ma PS; Chitswe K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 19918591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different onlay systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with and without glass fiber posts.
    Salameh Z; Ounsi HF; Aboushelib MN; Al-Hamdan R; Sadig W; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2010 Apr; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 20608297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
    Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of endodontic treatment, post insertion, and ceramic restoration on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Bitter K; Meyer-Lueckel H; Fotiadis N; Blunck U; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM; Paris S
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jun; 43(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 20536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
    Guess PC; Stappert CF
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics.
    Clelland NL; Ramirez A; Katsube N; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17280887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps.
    Stappert CF; Abe P; Kurths V; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Feb; 10(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 18389735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.