107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22774856)
1. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
Masson ME; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):898-914. PubMed ID: 22774856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.
Scaltritti M; Balota DA; Peressotti F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 22906041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tan SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 22612169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.
Masson ME; Rabe MM; Kliegl R
Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):480-492. PubMed ID: 27787683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Syllable priming with pseudowords in the lexical decision task.
Mathey S; Doignon-Camus N; Chetail F
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 23914749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stage visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.
Kim AE; Straková J
Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():52-62. PubMed ID: 22784511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing?
Kole JA; Healy AF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):462-72. PubMed ID: 22686841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of relatedness proportion on the joint relationship among word frequency, stimulus quality, and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2452-2461. PubMed ID: 30947626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
