107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22774856)
21. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
Lété B; Bonin P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
Besner D; Wartak S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 18248152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Semantic priming effects from single words in a lexical decision task.
Noguera C; Ortells JJ; Abad MJ; Carmona E; Daza MT
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 16950164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary?
Borowsky R; Besner D
Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):181-95; discussion 196-200. PubMed ID: 16478310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relationship between reading ability and lateralized lexical decision.
Weems SA; Zaidel E
Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):507-15. PubMed ID: 15223197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Dicke J; Taylor SC; Gullick MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1683-91. PubMed ID: 21892884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of homograph meaning frequency on semantic satiation.
Black SR; Leonard RC; Willis S; Burton P; McCown S; Lookadoo R; Wayde E
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 24041302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
Frankish C; Barnes L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Markedness effects in Norwegian-English bilinguals: task-dependent use of language-specific letters and bigrams.
van Kesteren R; Dijkstra T; de Smedt K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2129-54. PubMed ID: 22554207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.
Andrews S; Lo S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 21875252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. SOA-dependent N400 and P300 semantic priming effects using pseudoword primes and a delayed lexical decision.
Hill H; Ott F; Weisbrod M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jun; 56(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 15866325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements.
Chamberland C; Saint-Aubin J; Légère MA
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 22686151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.
Madan CR; Shafer AT; Chan M; Singhal A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):793-810. PubMed ID: 27003746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the joint effects of repetition and stimulus quality in lexical decision: looking to the past for a new way forward.
Blais C; O'Malley S; Besner D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2368-82. PubMed ID: 21819278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Language nonselective access to phonological representations: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals.
Zhou H; Chen B; Yang M; Dunlap S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2051-66. PubMed ID: 20486019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
