These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22775076)

  • 1. The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review.
    Fitridge I; Dempster T; Guenther J; de Nys R
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(7):649-69. PubMed ID: 22775076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antifouling processes and toxicity effects of antifouling paints on marine environment. A review.
    Amara I; Miled W; Slama RB; Ladhari N
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Jan; 57():115-130. PubMed ID: 29258017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To treat or not to treat: a quantitative review of the effect of biofouling and control methods in shellfish aquaculture to evaluate the necessity of removal.
    Sievers M; Fitridge I; Bui S; Dempster T
    Biofouling; 2017 Oct; 33(9):755-767. PubMed ID: 28876130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marine biofouling on fish farms and its remediation.
    Braithwaite RA; McEvoy LA
    Adv Mar Biol; 2005; 47():215-52. PubMed ID: 15596168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review of recent research and developments.
    Bannister J; Sievers M; Bush F; Bloecher N
    Biofouling; 2019 Jul; 35(6):631-648. PubMed ID: 31339358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring biofouling communities could reduce impacts to mussel aquaculture by allowing synchronisation of husbandry techniques with peaks in settlement.
    Sievers M; Dempster T; Fitridge I; Keough MJ
    Biofouling; 2014 Feb; 30(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24401014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential antifouling strategies for marine finfish aquaculture: the effects of physical and chemical treatments on the settlement and survival of the hydroid Ectopleura larynx.
    Guenther J; Fitridge I; Misimi E
    Biofouling; 2011 Oct; 27(9):1033-42. PubMed ID: 22017479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing biofouling control treatments for use on aquaculture nets.
    Swain G; Shinjo N
    Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Dec; 15(12):22142-54. PubMed ID: 25474085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bio-invasive ascidians in Ireland: A threat for the shellfish industry but also a source of high added value products.
    Palanisamy SK; Thomas OP; P McCormack G
    Bioengineered; 2018 Jan; 9(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 29072513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and emerging environmentally-friendly systems for fouling control in the marine environment.
    Gittens JE; Smith TJ; Suleiman R; Akid R
    Biotechnol Adv; 2013 Dec; 31(8):1738-53. PubMed ID: 24051087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creating New Antifoulants Using the Tools and Tactics of Medicinal Chemistry.
    Cahill PL; Moodie LWK; Hertzer C; Pinori E; Pavia H; Hellio C; Brimble MA; Svenson J
    Acc Chem Res; 2024 Feb; 57(3):399-412. PubMed ID: 38277792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biofouling leads to reduced shell growth and flesh weight in the cultured mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis.
    Sievers M; Fitridge I; Dempster T; Keough MJ
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 23256892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship.
    Schultz MP; Bendick JA; Holm ER; Hertel WM
    Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 21161774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of antifouling practices on marine invasions.
    Piola RF; Dafforn KA; Johnston EL
    Biofouling; 2009 Oct; 25(7):633-44. PubMed ID: 20183122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antifouling strategies: history and regulation, ecological impacts and mitigation.
    Dafforn KA; Lewis JA; Johnston EL
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Mar; 62(3):453-65. PubMed ID: 21324495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risks of using antifouling biocides in aquaculture.
    Guardiola FA; Cuesta A; Meseguer J; Esteban MA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2012; 13(2):1541-1560. PubMed ID: 22408407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mini-review: Inhibition of biofouling by marine microorganisms.
    Dobretsov S; Abed RM; Teplitski M
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(4):423-41. PubMed ID: 23574279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The environmental fate and effects of antifouling paint biocides.
    Thomas KV; Brooks S
    Biofouling; 2010 Jan; 26(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 20390558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of "inert" surface chemistry in marine biofouling prevention.
    Rosenhahn A; Schilp S; Kreuzer HJ; Grunze M
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 May; 12(17):4275-86. PubMed ID: 20407695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metal pollution affects both native and non-indigenous biofouling recruitment in a subtropical island system.
    Ramalhosa P; Gestoso I; Duarte B; Caçador I; Canning-Clode J
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Apr; 141():373-386. PubMed ID: 30955747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.