BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22775493)

  • 21. Impact of Regulatory Incentive Programs on the Future of Pediatric Drug Development.
    Yen E; Davis JM; Milne CP
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Sep; 53(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 30983385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research--do children really benefit?
    Boots I; Sukhai RN; Klein RH; Holl RA; Wit JM; Cohen AF; Burggraaf J
    Eur J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 166(8):849-55. PubMed ID: 17225950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patent extension policy for paediatric indications: an evaluation of the impact within three drug classes in a state Medicaid programme.
    Nelson RE; McAdam-Marx C; Evans ML; Ward R; Campbell B; Brixner D; Lafleur J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 May; 9(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 21506623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An empirical review of major legislation affecting drug development: past experiences, effects, and unintended consequences.
    Kesselheim AS
    Milbank Q; 2011 Sep; 89(3):450-502. PubMed ID: 21933276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
    Carrier MA
    Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Six-Month Market Exclusivity Extensions To Promote Research Offer Substantial Returns For Many Drug Makers.
    Kesselheim AS; Rome BN; Sarpatwari A; Avorn J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Feb; 36(2):362-370. PubMed ID: 28100464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: business practices.
    ; Steiner DJ
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2014 Dec; ():1-38. PubMed ID: 25771555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions.
    Gross JM; Curry JA
    Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 43(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 18354866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Method for Approximating Future Entry of Generic Drugs.
    Beall RF; Darrow JJ; Kesselheim AS
    Value Health; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1382-1389. PubMed ID: 30502781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. Issue brief.
    Thomson Reuters/West
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-39. PubMed ID: 21374841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pediatric Medicine Development: An Overview and Comparison of Regulatory Processes in the European Union and United States.
    Penkov D; Tomasi P; Eichler I; Murphy D; Yao LP; Temeck J
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2017 May; 51(3):360-371. PubMed ID: 28674673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tort claims and federal regulation of medical devices vs pharmaceuticals.
    Green M
    JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(11):1169; author reply 1169-70. PubMed ID: 19755694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Regulating the safety of pharmaceuticals: the FDA, preemption, and the public's health.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2009 May; 301(19):2036-7. PubMed ID: 19454642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: business practices.
    Steiner DJ
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-36. PubMed ID: 24482889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The case for preemption of prescription drug failure-to-warn claims.
    Kim CH
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(2):399-422. PubMed ID: 17632969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. To inform or persuade? Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.
    Berndt ER
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 15673797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The balance between innovation and competition: the Hatch-Waxman Act, the 2003 Amendments, and beyond.
    Kelly C
    Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(3):417-78, iii. PubMed ID: 24505856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Informed by the European Union experience: what the United States can anticipate and learn from the European Union's regulatory approach to biosimilars.
    Gitter DM
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2011; 41(2):559-92. PubMed ID: 21739759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Teva v. Eisai: what's the real "controversy"?
    Wang GL
    Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(4):631-54, iii. PubMed ID: 24505831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatric therapies.
    Roberts R; Rodriguez W; Murphy D; Crescenzi T
    JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):905-11. PubMed ID: 12928467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.